Originally posted by Dasa If you are one who defends atheism - then you are defeated in every respect.
Continually defending atheism is very foolish and dishonest.
Because atheism is the denial of that which is true.
And you know this.
you continue with a nonsensical narrative. simply declaring something does not make it so. all you have managed to reveal thus far is your own foolishness and dishonesty.
Originally posted by VoidSpirit apparently you haven't read the bible. the bible god demands all sorts of killing from its adherants, from sacrifices to genocide.
Dasa is a lover of all animals and believes "animal killers" have changed
things in the Holy Bible in order to justify killing animals as well as humans.
He believes the command "thou shall not murder" was not changed to
correct an earlier translation of "thou shall not kill" but to justify the slaughter
of animals for food.
If Dasa believe killing animals is a sin then he's going to have to change a LOT more than just the aforementioned Commandment to make the bible fit into his radical belief system.
Originally posted by sumydid If Dasa believe killing animals is a sin then he's going to have to change a LOT more than just the aforementioned Commandment to make the bible fit into his radical belief system.
Yes, he does think much of it has been changed by the "animal killers".
I doubt if he can be reasoned with either for he seems to be firmly
indoctrinated, similiar to many cult followers.
Originally posted by sumydid If Dasa believe killing animals is a sin then he's going to have to change a LOT more than just the aforementioned Commandment to make the bible fit into his radical belief system.
i agree. that's quiet a lot of editing just to justify killing animals. but that's dasa for you. making all sorts of base assumptions about other things while accepting a mythical view of history of his own religion as something real.
Talk about seeing the silver lining in the clouds... if Dasa can manage to present something voidspirit and sumydid can agree on, then he serves a good purpose afterall. Eh? 😀
Originally posted by sumydid Talk about seeing the silver lining in the clouds... if Dasa can manage to present something voidspirit and sumydid can agree on, then he serves a good purpose afterall. Eh? 😀
It's really amazing how much utter BS can be written in 3,000 years. The thing is, when stuff gets written, a generation later they think it is from some god or other and takes on a life of its own, a self perpetuating myth. And they thought there was no such thing as perpetual motion🙂
Originally posted by sonhouse It's really amazing how much utter BS can be written in 3,000 years. The thing is, when stuff gets written, a generation later they think it is from some god or other and takes on a life of its own, a self perpetuating myth. And they thought there was no such thing as perpetual motion🙂
Why do you come on this forum to read such utter BS? Go to the science
forum where you belong.
Originally posted by sonhouse It's really amazing how much utter BS can be written in 3,000 years. The thing is, when stuff gets written, a generation later they think it is from some god or other and takes on a life of its own, a self perpetuating myth. And they thought there was no such thing as perpetual motion🙂
Originally posted by sumydid Talk about seeing the silver lining in the clouds... if Dasa can manage to present something voidspirit and sumydid can agree on, then he serves a good purpose afterall. Eh? 😀