Originally posted by Jirakon
How come there are so many creationists, IDers, and other anti-science people...
That's a pretty backward statement. Creation and Intelligent Design are not anti-science; it's just the opposite. Science points to a supernatural origin of the universe, and of life. Science is about making observations, then coming up with the best possible explanati enough to claim that the best explanation for the universe and life is supernatural.
What about sexual reproduction? How could asexual beings naturally evolve two different sexual systems that are completely useless without each other?
Sex is simply haploid cells merging, breaking apart, merging again, etc. That's all there is to it. The rest is refinement. Either sperm or egg could evolve without the other; a sperm is just a haploid cell with propulsion; an egg is just a big haploid cell with mitochondria.
The Laws of Entropy and Conservation of Energy apply to closed systems only. Life is not a closed system. The Earth is not a closed system.
What are the "Laws" of Causality and Biogenesis? How do causality or cell theory "show that neither the universe nor life could arise by natural laws of science"?
Biogenesis outcompetes abiogenesis, which is why we don't see it today. The "Law of Biogenesis" (all life comes from an egg) is not a Law in the same sense that the Law of Universal Gravitation is a Law. It's simply a model that describes the observations that have been made with respect to life in this oxidizing atmosphere with self-replicating life everywhere.
Bacteria don't need 11 systems to live or procreate.
However, there is not a single fossil of any species in a transitional state.
Yes there are. Didn't you know velociraptors had feathers? How about Lucy the Australopithecus? She was an ape that walked upright and had limbs intermediate in length ratio between chimpanzees and humans. What about the pakicetids, Ambulocetus, Rodhocetus, Dorudon, Squalodon?