Believers, Non-Believers & Morality

Originally posted by @dj2becker
More allegations without evidence...

"Evidence" for whom ~ for whose eyes?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
What evidence could you possibly have that someone is being deliberate in deceiving people? Give me some examples.

Your dodge is noted.

Originally posted by @fmf
"Evidence" for whom ~ for whose eyes?

In a court case it would be the judge and the jury.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Your dodge is noted.

What dodge? I answered it point blank. Go back and look.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
In a court case it would be the judge and the jury.

What "court case"?

Originally posted by @fmf
In the context of this thread, you simply got the wrong end of the stick. Ghost has no notion of divine law. Neither do I.

I don't think he'll ever understand that.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
I don't think he'll ever understand that.

I think pride may well be his issue rather than his understanding.

Originally posted by @fmf
I think pride may well be his issue rather than his understanding.

That's rich coming from you.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Ok wow. Lets walk through this. According to your definition of 'lying' you think I deliberately mislead people in everyday conversations on this forum? Really. Give me a few examples of me lying here in everyday conversations. Go on. If you can't do that you are lying by your own definition. Good luck proving that I have deliberately mislead people. (Which of course I haven't.)

Hang on, hang on.

Have you forgotten you made a public apology to this forum for 'deliberately misleading people' when you didn't make people aware you had switched accounts?

Are you now going to claim you didn't make such an apology or use the words 'deliberately misleading people?!

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Hang on, hang on.

Have you forgotten you made a public apology to this forum for 'deliberately misleading people' when you didn't make people aware you had switched accounts?

Are you now going to claim you didn't make such an apology or use the words 'deliberately misleading people?!

FMF claims that he thinks I lie in everyday conversations.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
That's rich coming from you.

I think Romans1009's silly stubbornness about Ghost of a Duke's atheism and theology credentials and the meaning of the word "notion" as used on page 1 of this thread is fuelled by his pride and not by an issue of understanding.

Originally posted by @fmf
I think Romans1009's silly stubbornness about Ghost of a Duke's atheism and theology credentials and the meaning of the word "notion" as used on page 1 of this thread is fuelled by his pride and not by an issue of understanding.

Do you regard yourself as a humble person?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
FMF claims that he thinks I lie in everyday conversations which basically means daily.

No, it doesn't; I am using it to mean "ordinary". With me, you frequently lie about our past conversations in a casual way in what ought to be ordinary exchanges.

Originally posted by @fmf
No, it doesn't; I am using it to mean "ordinary". With me, you frequently lie about our past conversations in a casual way in what ought to be ordinary exchanges.

How do you know that I am lying? I.e that I am deliberately misleading you?

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Do you regard yourself as a humble person?

You can decide for yourself. Being "humble" is about the nature of interactions with other people, so it's for those who are on the receiving end of interactions with me to decide whether they find me "humble" or not. I almost invariably rub jerks and people with chips on their shoulders up the wrong way. I do not regard myself as either "humble" or not "humble".