Birth Control

If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!

Originally posted by 667joe
If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!

Maybe thats why Catholics don't use it...😕

Originally posted by 667joe
If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!

Um....didn't you create a thread saying this only a few months ago?

Originally posted by Conrau K
Um....didn't you create a thread saying this only a few months ago?

I don't think I put the proposition quite the same way. Really original ideas in this forum are rare, so what is your point?

What say you FMF.

Looks like Freaky was right on the money.

Meanwhile, Jesus wasn't the only biblical birth possible only through God's direct action... so though the more important point is obvioius, it was clearly missed. Nothing is impossible when God is involved. A lady can wear a world class chastity belt, a 2-inch-thick steel plate armor, and a carefully positioned spring loaded clamping trap with steel jaws, and STILL get pregnant if that is God's intention.

Originally posted by sumydid
Meanwhile, Jesus wasn't the only biblical birth possible only through God's direct action... so though the more important point is obvioius, it was clearly missed. Nothing is impossible when God is involved. A lady can wear a world class chastity belt, a 2-inch-thick steel plate armor, and a carefully positioned spring loaded clamping trap with steel jaws, and STILL get pregnant if that is God's intention.

Tell me about it. That God of yours must be one big horn-dog...

Originally posted by usmc7257
Tell me about it. That God of yours must be one big horn-dog...

Why do you think they call it a 'He'?

Originally posted by 667joe
If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!

I must admit, this is one of your more lame op's.

Originally posted by usmc7257
Tell me about it. That God of yours must be one big horn-dog...

Should I feel encouraged to tell you anything, when you reduce my God to a deep-fried, batter-dipped wiener on a stick?

Originally posted by sumydid
Should I feel encouraged to tell you anything, when you reduce my God to a deep-fried, batter-dipped wiener on a stick?

Because it would make for interesting reading ? 🙂

Of course, I understand your protest and you shouldn't have to be forced to answer anything when it comes to "spirituality",for I dont believe "God " has any rules ,only guidelines.

Originally posted by 667joe
I don't think I put the proposition quite the same way. Really original ideas in this forum are rare, so what is your point?

Can I expect then that you will start yet another thread again positing that the doctrine of the Virgin Birth vitiates the efficacy of abstinence? It was a really stupid idea to begin with. Why you want to call attention to it again I have no idea.

Originally posted by Conrau K
Can I expect then that you will start yet another thread again positing that the doctrine of the Virgin Birth vitiates the efficacy of abstinence? It was a really stupid idea to begin with. Why you want to call attention to it again I have no idea.

I am a little slow. Please explain why my post is stupid to you. Thank you!

Originally posted by 667joe
I am a little slow. Please explain why my post is stupid to you. Thank you!

Why? I already did, as did others. I see no point revisiting the same subject.

Originally posted by sumydid
What say you FMF.

Looks like Freaky was right on the money.

Has 667joe hurt your feelings?