1. Maryland
    Joined
    10 Jun '05
    Moves
    110450
    23 Nov '11 22:29
    If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!
  2. Standard memberusmc7257
    semper fi
    Joined
    02 Oct '03
    Moves
    112520
    23 Nov '11 22:331 edit
    Originally posted by 667joe
    If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!
    Maybe thats why Catholics don't use it...😕
  3. Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    23 Nov '11 23:58
    Originally posted by 667joe
    If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!
    Um....didn't you create a thread saying this only a few months ago?
  4. Maryland
    Joined
    10 Jun '05
    Moves
    110450
    24 Nov '11 00:54
    Originally posted by Conrau K
    Um....didn't you create a thread saying this only a few months ago?
    I don't think I put the proposition quite the same way. Really original ideas in this forum are rare, so what is your point?
  5. Standard membersumydid
    Aficionado of Prawns
    Not of this World
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    38013
    24 Nov '11 02:19
    What say you FMF.

    Looks like Freaky was right on the money.
  6. Standard membersumydid
    Aficionado of Prawns
    Not of this World
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    38013
    24 Nov '11 02:24
    Meanwhile, Jesus wasn't the only biblical birth possible only through God's direct action... so though the more important point is obvioius, it was clearly missed. Nothing is impossible when God is involved. A lady can wear a world class chastity belt, a 2-inch-thick steel plate armor, and a carefully positioned spring loaded clamping trap with steel jaws, and STILL get pregnant if that is God's intention.
  7. Standard memberusmc7257
    semper fi
    Joined
    02 Oct '03
    Moves
    112520
    24 Nov '11 02:301 edit
    Originally posted by sumydid
    Meanwhile, Jesus wasn't the only biblical birth possible only through God's direct action... so though the more important point is obvioius, it was clearly missed. Nothing is impossible when God is involved. A lady can wear a world class chastity belt, a 2-inch-thick steel plate armor, and a carefully positioned spring loaded clamping trap with steel jaws, and STILL get pregnant if that is God's intention.
    Tell me about it. That God of yours must be one big horn-dog...
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52613
    24 Nov '11 03:14
    Originally posted by usmc7257
    Tell me about it. That God of yours must be one big horn-dog...
    Why do you think they call it a 'He'?
  9. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    the Devil himself
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    91531
    24 Nov '11 03:24
    Originally posted by 667joe
    If Mary was a virgin when she gave birth to Jesus, we have proof that abstinence is not a fool proof method of birth control!
    I must admit, this is one of your more lame op's.
  10. Standard membersumydid
    Aficionado of Prawns
    Not of this World
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    38013
    24 Nov '11 04:36
    Originally posted by usmc7257
    Tell me about it. That God of yours must be one big horn-dog...
    Should I feel encouraged to tell you anything, when you reduce my God to a deep-fried, batter-dipped wiener on a stick?
  11. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    the Devil himself
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    91531
    24 Nov '11 05:32
    Originally posted by sumydid
    Should I feel encouraged to tell you anything, when you reduce my God to a deep-fried, batter-dipped wiener on a stick?
    Because it would make for interesting reading ? 🙂

    Of course, I understand your protest and you shouldn't have to be forced to answer anything when it comes to "spirituality",for I dont believe "God " has any rules ,only guidelines.
  12. Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    24 Nov '11 20:58
    Originally posted by 667joe
    I don't think I put the proposition quite the same way. Really original ideas in this forum are rare, so what is your point?
    Can I expect then that you will start yet another thread again positing that the doctrine of the Virgin Birth vitiates the efficacy of abstinence? It was a really stupid idea to begin with. Why you want to call attention to it again I have no idea.
  13. Maryland
    Joined
    10 Jun '05
    Moves
    110450
    24 Nov '11 21:06
    Originally posted by Conrau K
    Can I expect then that you will start yet another thread again positing that the doctrine of the Virgin Birth vitiates the efficacy of abstinence? It was a really stupid idea to begin with. Why you want to call attention to it again I have no idea.
    I am a little slow. Please explain why my post is stupid to you. Thank you!
  14. Joined
    15 Sep '04
    Moves
    7051
    24 Nov '11 23:02
    Originally posted by 667joe
    I am a little slow. Please explain why my post is stupid to you. Thank you!
    Why? I already did, as did others. I see no point revisiting the same subject.
  15. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29835
    24 Nov '11 23:07
    Originally posted by sumydid
    What say you FMF.

    Looks like Freaky was right on the money.
    Has 667joe hurt your feelings?
Back to Top