Originally posted by ThinkOfOne
No idea where you're trying to go with this. It's so vague so as to be meaningless.
Here's a real specific and basic principle for you to mull over. Setting aside the more complex details of the OT's system of sacrifice, consider the orthodox Christian doctrine of atonement obtained via the Cross. As this doctrine is considered, ask yourself this one question: when was the work (of atonement) finished?
If you correctly answer that it was finished when the Lord Jesus Christ declared it as such (using the perfect tense of
tetelestai, which denotes absolute and enduring finality), then you are faced with a dilemma. For if the atonement was secured as of that moment, He was still alive with no major blood loss. Even if you were to declare that His statement was anticipatory of His expiration, there was no major blood loss at the point of His release of His spirit.
He gave up His spirit; it was not taken from Him, did not happen as a result of any physical effect. After He released His spirit and died physically, the soldiers were motivated to get the show on the road, so to speak. This hastening of death involved breaking the legs of the men in order to prevent them from pushing their bodies up, which was reaction to the real cause of death in crucifixion: suffocation. Broken legs cannot act as support, cannot offer relief to lungs slowly smothered beneath the sagging weight of one's own body.
When the soldiers got to the third man, they found He had already died, therefore no need to break His legs. To certify His death, one of the soldiers speared His side which issued forth blood and water, thus signifying His certain death. But here again, no major blood loss.
So why do we say the blood of Christ covers us? Because the blood of Christ is the work of Christ done on the Cross. All of the symbolism of the OT and NT can be misleading, but only to those who want to be mislead, to those who put more faith in the material than they do in the Creator of material. For them, the symbol becomes the power with the result that they lose the meaning in the first place. Such religiosity leads to distractions like the shroud of Turin, search for Noah's Ark and so forth.
You can point out any example of misapplication and call it barbaric, but you'd be missing the point yourself--- as you are here. The supposed barbarism of such a belief system pales in comparison to its far greater failure: that which replaces spiritual reality with transient matter.