11 Feb '10 16:23>
Having been inspired by TOO's last thread, I thought I would share my own view of the need for blood sacrifice.
I think we can all agree on one thing, which is that all righteousness comes from God, not us. Such righteousness, is either written in our hearts, or given to us by his word, or through personal revelations etc. Our participation is wecolmed, but not compulsary. Having said that, any and all righteousness that we may choose to walk in given to us by God has nothing to do with our own righteousness, since such righteousness was given to us from God. We then have NO room to boast for walking in such righteounsess.
So at what point is walking in God's righteousness, or faith in his righteousness revealed to us, are we saved? After all, we have all transgressed and not walked in his righteousness at all times? For me, this is where blood sacrifice comes into play. We need atonement for our transgressions. For those who turn their nose up at blood sacrifice, the only alternative is atonement through good works. In other words, doing the right thing helps atone for the other times you did not do the right thing. From my own perspective, however, doing the right thing is expected, much like obeying the law of the land. For example, if one were to be put on trial for murder, would that person then bring in witnesses who praised the defendent on what an good and upright citizen the defendent was while, at the same time, refusing to address the charge of murder brought against him? In addition, would the defendent then attempt to follow the law the rest of his days to make up for the murder he was responsible for? The bottom line is that the defendent was EXPECTED to follow the law of the land. Following the righteousness of God is an expectation, not bonus points for the here after. This is why blood sacrifice was needed before Christ and after.
I think we can all agree on one thing, which is that all righteousness comes from God, not us. Such righteousness, is either written in our hearts, or given to us by his word, or through personal revelations etc. Our participation is wecolmed, but not compulsary. Having said that, any and all righteousness that we may choose to walk in given to us by God has nothing to do with our own righteousness, since such righteousness was given to us from God. We then have NO room to boast for walking in such righteounsess.
So at what point is walking in God's righteousness, or faith in his righteousness revealed to us, are we saved? After all, we have all transgressed and not walked in his righteousness at all times? For me, this is where blood sacrifice comes into play. We need atonement for our transgressions. For those who turn their nose up at blood sacrifice, the only alternative is atonement through good works. In other words, doing the right thing helps atone for the other times you did not do the right thing. From my own perspective, however, doing the right thing is expected, much like obeying the law of the land. For example, if one were to be put on trial for murder, would that person then bring in witnesses who praised the defendent on what an good and upright citizen the defendent was while, at the same time, refusing to address the charge of murder brought against him? In addition, would the defendent then attempt to follow the law the rest of his days to make up for the murder he was responsible for? The bottom line is that the defendent was EXPECTED to follow the law of the land. Following the righteousness of God is an expectation, not bonus points for the here after. This is why blood sacrifice was needed before Christ and after.