Originally posted by Coletti
I went back an checked the link you added (should have done that earlier) to see if I agreed with the "initial claim."
I guess we need to define an increase in informations so that the processes shows a clear mechanism that would tak ...[text shortened]... are not clearly positive - there is no evidence of evolution.
The purpose of this thread is to discuss the broad statement about genetic information - or even the broader one which makes a statement about information as a whole. This is not a thread in which I defend the whole theory of evolution.
People have made a definite claim that something is not possible. This claim involves 'intelligence' and 'information'. Evolution is not involved in the claim, though the claim is generally used to attack the TOE with the assumption that the claim is correct, and therefore the TOE cannot be correct. It's like this:
1) The TOE assumes information can be created without intelligent intervention.
2) Information cannot be created without intelligent information.
3) Therefore, the TOE is wrong.
I dispute the claim about information (#2), and I've given a reasonable example which shows that the claim is not true. This does not mean I need to give a detailed explanation and defense of the theory of evolution. That's not really relevant. It would shift this debate away from the topic and it would take a whole lot of time and effort on my part. I'd be put in the position of defending an entirely different claim. There's probably some fallacy that describes this situation, though I don't know what it is formally called.