Originally posted by twhiteheadThat's fallacious logic. E.g.:
(except by realizing that as God does not exist he could not have a father)
Q: "Did Frodo Baggins have a father?"
A: "Since Frodo Baggins never existed, he doesn't have a father".
The question is whether the concept of "God" is incompatible with the concept of "having a father".
Originally posted by lucifershammerNot as fallacious as you claim. Frodo Baggins does not have a father in the sense that no father of Frodo Baggins has ever existed.
That's fallacious logic. E.g.:
Q: "Did Frodo Baggins have a father?"
A: "Since Frodo Baggins never existed, he doesn't have a father".
The question is whether the concept of "God" is incompatible with the concept of "having a father".
The question "does God have a father" presumes the existence of God.
However, there is absolutely no point in discussing whether the concept of "God" is incompatible with the concept of "having a father" as neither concept is well defined enough to make conclusions about their compatibility.