14 Feb '11 05:12>
I am not sure if this should be here or in Science, but it is about things usually discussed here.
This claim comes up over and over in this forums:
"Everybody knows that everything in the universe is caused"
or its cleverly posed in another form:
"Show me something that is known not to have a cause"
It is my claim that the vast majority of events in the universe are uncaused and although this cannot be trivially proven it is my claim that modern science and the concept of randomness rely on the fact that many events are either uncaused or indistinguishable from being caused.
So I will try to present my reasoning as to why I think that when I throw a dice, the resulting number is totally uncaused, and I would like to hear from anyone who thinks they have a convincing argument that there is reason to believe that all events in the universe are caused.
I think I should point out a couple of pitfalls. I remember knightmeister believed in universal causation, but he then had extreme difficulty explaining free will. He also at one point admitted the necessity of the existence of brute facts (ie uncaused facts). Some people try to get round it by putting God as the sole uncaused cause and explaining that by claiming he is eternal - and thus avoiding the problem of having a time prior to his existence.
This claim comes up over and over in this forums:
"Everybody knows that everything in the universe is caused"
or its cleverly posed in another form:
"Show me something that is known not to have a cause"
It is my claim that the vast majority of events in the universe are uncaused and although this cannot be trivially proven it is my claim that modern science and the concept of randomness rely on the fact that many events are either uncaused or indistinguishable from being caused.
So I will try to present my reasoning as to why I think that when I throw a dice, the resulting number is totally uncaused, and I would like to hear from anyone who thinks they have a convincing argument that there is reason to believe that all events in the universe are caused.
I think I should point out a couple of pitfalls. I remember knightmeister believed in universal causation, but he then had extreme difficulty explaining free will. He also at one point admitted the necessity of the existence of brute facts (ie uncaused facts). Some people try to get round it by putting God as the sole uncaused cause and explaining that by claiming he is eternal - and thus avoiding the problem of having a time prior to his existence.