Originally posted by C HessAmericans.
Who the hell looks at his/her baby boy and thinks: "You know what? How about we grab a knife and cut part of his dick off? That should be fun, right? Though I wonder what day would be the best day for this kind of thing. Honey, could you go get the bible please?"
But don't you dare do something similar to a girl! Then it's mutilation.
Originally posted by Great King RatCircumcision and "female circumcision" are in NO way similar. The first has been done for literally thousands of years and has been shown to have no ill effects and the second is indeed life-threatening mutilation.
Americans.
But don't you dare do something similar to a girl! Then it's mutilation.
For you to say they are similar is just gross ignorance.
Originally posted by SuzianneBut Suzianne, it's in the Bible. That's why they're saying ignorant things! 😉
Circumcision and "female circumcision" are in NO way similar. The first has been done for literally thousands of years and has been shown to have no ill effects and the second is indeed life-threatening mutilation.
For you to say they are similar is just gross ignorance.
Originally posted by SuzianneIt's funny that the scumbags would criticize circumcision but before abortion!
Circumcision and "female circumcision" are in NO way similar. The first has been done for literally thousands of years and has been shown to have no ill effects and the second is indeed life-threatening mutilation.
For you to say they are similar is just gross ignorance.
Originally posted by SuziannePerforming surgery on a helpless child without there being a medical necessity is bad, mmmkay.
Circumcision and "female circumcision" are in NO way similar. The first has been done for literally thousands of years and has been shown to have no ill effects and the second is indeed life-threatening mutilation.
For you to say they are similar is just gross ignorance.
As I predicted, is furiously opposing female circumcision but has no problem with the male kind.
Didn't you want gender equality or something? Probably only when it suits you, right?
Originally posted by SuzianneSo, using the knife on your baby is fine, so long as it's not life threatening? You'll have to excuse me, but from where I stand you don't mess with your baby's genitalia - beyond the obligatory cleaning, of course. If suddenly you feel an urge to grab the knife, just walk away, okay? Promise me you'll just walk away.
Circumcision and "female circumcision" are in NO way similar. The first has been done for literally thousands of years and has been shown to have no ill effects and the second is indeed life-threatening mutilation.
25 Sep 14
Originally posted by C HessMind you, she said "no ill effects". I am very certain that we could find some "good" examples of ill effects that happened during or after this completely unnecessary surgery.
So, using the knife on your baby is fine, so long as it's not life threatening? You'll have to excuse me, but from where I stand you don't mess with your baby's genitalia - beyond the obligatory cleaning, of course. If suddenly you feel an urge to grab the knife, just walk away, okay? Promise me you'll just walk away.
Originally posted by SuzianneIf "female circumcision" (and there are many kinds) was
Circumcision and "female circumcision" are in NO way similar. The first has been done for literally thousands of years and has been shown to have no ill effects and the second is indeed life-threatening mutilation.
For you to say they are similar is just gross ignorance.
demanded by the bible it would be universally accepted.
Anyone who doubts that is an idiot.