@kellyjay saidAnd you lazily ignore posters who challenge you, send them creepy PMs between putting them back on ignore, offer to chat I-2-1 in games instead of in the threads or even bizarrely in the PM function.
And yet you post on threads you have no interest in actually seeing the context. Talk about lazy!
You have become a very odd character over the last 18 months Kellyjay.
344d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNot in a species he made to have free will.
If God exists, He either 'cannot' prevent evil or simply doesn't care about it.
344d
@pawnpaw saidWhat about biblical miracles? Clearly God got involved in the physical world then.
Someone told me this. I don't necessarily support it.
God and his angels operate in the subconscious world, and we mortals in the physical world.
God cannot, or won't, interfere in the physical world.
Same as we can not interfere in the subconscious world.
But God use mortals, ie me and you, to change things, or situations in the physical world.
If we can not, or will not, change a situation we suffer in, then its on us.
So we have a choice.
Does it make sense?
@suzianne said"Not in a species he made to have free will."
What about biblical miracles? Clearly God got involved in the physical world then.
"What about biblical miracles? Clearly God got involved in the physical world then."
I don't think the above two statements are homogeneous. The Bible does indeed include miracles where God got involved in the physical world, and by so doing 'did' intervene with human freewill.
Why then wouldn't an all powerful and all loving God intervene to prevent the suffering of a innocent child (for example) when the Bible illustrates He has done so before?
343d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhy don't you start your thread, since the link that speaks to this isn't on your menu?
"Not in a species he made to have free will."
"What about biblical miracles? Clearly God got involved in the physical world then."
I don't think the above two statements are homogeneous. The Bible does indeed include miracles where God got involved in the physical world, and by so doing 'did' intervene with human freewill.
Why then wouldn't an all powerful ...[text shortened]... nt the suffering of a innocent child (for example) when the Bible illustrates He has done so before?
343d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidyea the former, nay the latter.
I'm taking over this thread and saving it from tedium.
342d
@ghost-of-a-duke saidMore than "the usual suspects." Gad, the Spirituality Forum has gotten dull.
More razzmatazz you think?