Go back
Coercion and deterrence and assertions

Coercion and deterrence and assertions

Spirituality


If supernatural punishment meted out by a creator entity to people after they die was a reality...

and the threat of it was intended as some kind of blend of coercion and deterrence [or warning]...

what would be the moral purpose of essentially keeping this reality hidden from those still alive ~ aside from unprovable assertions made by people reciting religious dogma?

Where is the "divine" and moral logic in this arrangement?

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
If supernatural punishment meted out by a creator entity to people after they die was a reality...

and the threat of it was intended as some kind of blend of coercion and deterrence [or warning]...

what would be the moral purpose of essentially keeping this reality hidden from those still alive ~ aside from unprovable assertions made by people reciting religious dogma?

Where is the "divine" and moral logic in this arrangement?
Exactly who is doing this "hiding" of this information?

Refusing to believe something you've been told doesn't mean it's being "hidden" from you.

1 edit

@suzianne said
Exactly who is doing this "hiding" of this information?
Exactly who is doing this "hiding" of this information?

It'd be the creator entity supposedly meting out the supernatural punishment. Nobody living has seen any proof that these threats are about something real.

Refusing to believe something you've been told doesn't mean it's being "hidden" from you.

Told by whom?

People can't be expected to simply "believe something" because of assertions citing religious dogma.



-Removed-
What's also interesting about the idea that there is some imperative to "believe something" that one is "told" by religionists is that what I am being "told" about supernatural punishment by, say, sonship is totally different from what I am being "told" about supernatural punishment by, say, Suzianne.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down


-Removed-
The moral incoherence, it must be said, is alienating [to put it mildly] and it taints all other messages and assertions that come in its wake.

2 edits

Vote Up
Vote Down

@fmf said
Exactly who is doing this "hiding" of this information?

It'd be the creator entity supposedly meting out the supernatural punishment. Nobody living has seen any proof that these threats are about something real.

Refusing to believe something you've been told doesn't mean it's being "hidden" from you.

Told by whom?

People can't be expected to simply "believe something" because of assertions citing religious dogma.
But to your point, is it really being "hidden"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
That's not his point.

He's complaining that such info is being somehow "hidden" from him.


@suzianne said
But to your point, is it really being "hidden"?
Yes.

There is no evidence that it is real.

Assertions by religious people are not evidence.

Their certainty and earnestness do not lend any weight to their assertions.

Whether the supernatural punishment [exacted on the dead] is real or not is, for all intents and purposes, kept secret from those still living.


@suzianne said
He's complaining that such info is being somehow "hidden" from him.
Being "told" by someone to "believe something", the existence of which cannot be proven, does not alter the fact it is essentially being hidden from those who don't believe what that "someone" claimed was true.


@fmf said
If supernatural punishment meted out by a creator entity to people after they die was a reality...

and the threat of it was intended as some kind of blend of coercion and deterrence [or warning]...

what would be the moral purpose of essentially keeping this reality hidden from those still alive ~ aside from unprovable assertions made by people reciting religious dogma?

Where is the "divine" and moral logic in this arrangement?
Your premise is flawed.

"Everlasting destruction" isn't a theory to be philosophically debated by the created.

Eternal separation from the life of God is a clear and unequivocal doctrine taught by Jesus, and clearly elaborated and collaborated on by the entire bible.

The scriptures are the final authority and the sole source of knowledge concerning eternal damnation and punishment.

Provision has been made for all to escape death.


@josephw said
Your premise is flawed.

"Everlasting destruction" isn't a theory to be philosophically debated by the created.

Eternal separation from the life of God is a clear and unequivocal doctrine taught by Jesus, and clearly elaborated and collaborated on by the entire bible.

The scriptures are the final authority and the sole source of knowledge concerning eternal damnation and punishment.

Provision has been made for all to escape death.
Thank you for the five assertions you have made here. Rather than addressing my OP, though, you seem to have simply illustrated what I am talking about instead.


@josephw said
"Everlasting destruction" isn't a theory to be philosophically debated by the created.
If this is what you believe, then feel free to not debate it.