Go back
Coincidence

Coincidence

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

God only answers prayers when coincidences are possible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 667joe
God only answers prayers when coincidences are possible.
for example?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by generalissimo
for example?
That is to say god only answers prayers if their is another explanation possible. For example, if you lost an arm and prayed for a new real arm, it won't happen, whereas if you have a fever and pray to get better, perhaps you got better because of your host resistance or the antibiotic you took.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 667joe
That is to say god only answers prayers if their is another explanation possible. For example, if you lost an arm and prayed for a new real arm, it won't happen, whereas if you have a fever and pray to get better, perhaps you got better because of your host resistance or the antibiotic you took.
You would be talking about a miracle, which by definition is a rare event. I would imagine that most Christians would struggle to have the faith needed to pray regularly for miracles , and if no-one is praying for the "new arm" then God can't answer a prayer that doesn't get said.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 667joe
God only answers prayers when coincidences are possible.
People shouldn't waste their energy praying . They should get off their butts and make this world a better place. Cause God aint out there. God is in all of us. And in that sense there is nothing supernatural about taking out the garbage. But it still has to be done.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by knightmeister
You would be talking about a miracle, which by definition is a rare event. I would imagine that most Christians would struggle to have the faith needed to pray regularly for miracles , and if no-one is praying for the "new arm" then God can't answer a prayer that doesn't get said.
So you are saying that most of the time God answers prayers, it is not a miracle?
By it not being a miracle, do you mean that it would have happened anyway, or that it was within the normal laws of science? ie what does 'miracle' mean to you?
Do miracles that violate the laws of science ever happen?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by twhitehead
So you are saying that most of the time God answers prayers, it is not a miracle?
By it not being a miracle, do you mean that it would have happened anyway, or that it was within the normal laws of science? ie what does 'miracle' mean to you?
Do miracles that violate the laws of science ever happen?
What i am saying is, there is no god and when a theist thinks god answered a prayer, it is merely a coincidence, (or the person praying took matters into his own hands.)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 667joe
That is to say god only answers prayers if their is another explanation possible. For example, if you lost an arm and prayed for a new real arm, it won't happen, whereas if you have a fever and pray to get better, perhaps you got better because of your host resistance or the antibiotic you took.
You are talking about prayers of petition. This is hardly the only means of praying. There are many other types of non-petition prayers that ask for nothing. What about those?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Badwater
You are talking about prayers of petition. This is hardly the only means of praying. There are many other types of non-petition prayers that ask for nothing. What about those?
Meditation.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 667joe
Meditation.
no, meditation at least in the biblical sense means to mull over something in ones mind, it literally means talking in an undertone with oneself, not to God. Secondly there are prayers of thanks and prayers of praise none of which have anything to do with asking God for something, nor of meditating.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by 667joe
Meditation.
Methinks that if you are going to offer a thought on a subject, then you should learn something of the subject lest it be construed as the rantings of the ignorant. Then, after learning something of the subject, offer said thought; not a baseless opinion that is masquerading as a thought.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Badwater
Methinks that if you are going to offer a thought on a subject, then you should learn something of the subject lest it be construed as the rantings of the ignorant. Then, after learning something of the subject, offer said thought; not a baseless opinion that is masquerading as a thought.
Right back at ya!