04 Jun '18 06:39>
Originally posted by @fmfBecause they’re not superstitions?
It gives pause for thought: why do 21st century people obsess over the superstitions of Bronze Age people?
Originally posted by @fmfBecause they’re not superstitions?
It gives pause for thought: why do 21st century people obsess over the superstitions of Bronze Age people?
Originally posted by @philokaliaBut the Earth isn't held in place.
The earth is held in place by a graviational pull from the sun; it could be thought of as 'suspended' in place, floating, and drifting, in a steady pattern around the sun.
What you are actually disputing is semantics...
... And you are like picking a fight with the semantics of a dead language -- and, what is also noteworthy, is that most scholar ...[text shortened]... wording not being satisfactory to 21st century ears.
Amazingly high standards you got, moi8.
Originally posted by @wolfgang59When were the Greeks active in astronomy?
But the Earth isn't held in place.
It isn't stationary.
So saying that Job is incredibly scientifically accurate is utter rubbish.
It tells us nothing
Now if Job said 'the Earth is like a ball and revolveth around the Sun"
well that would be something - it would mean the Hebrews were up there with the Greeks.
Originally posted by @wolfgang59<<But the Earth isn't held in place.
But the Earth isn't held in place.
It isn't stationary.
So saying that Job is incredibly scientifically accurate is utter rubbish.
It tells us nothing
Now if Job said 'the Earth is like a ball and revolveth around the Sun"
well that would be something - it would mean the Hebrews were up there with the Greeks.
Originally posted by @romans1009Which is why I asked what you thought it meant!
<<But the Earth isn't held in place.
It isn't stationary.>>
The verse in Job doesn’t say either of these - it doesn’t say the earth is held in place and it doesn’t say the earth is stationary.
You’re saying the verse says something it doesn’t and then dismissing it as rubbish based on your mischaracterization.
Originally posted by @sonshipWow.
An MIT student once told me of a professor there who was an expert on stars who gave a long lecture on star formation. And at the end he said something like this.
paraphrased - " I have to let you know that I have no idea how stars shine nor does anyone else."
Or something close to that.
Originally posted by @romans1009I think there are written accounts dating from 500BCE.
When were the Greeks active in astronomy?
Originally posted by @sonship"We moderns" know more about the mechanics of the universe than the ancient Hebrews did.
The thought that we moderns know more about the mechanics of the universe than God is laughable.
Originally posted by @romans1009A similar argument could be made for the divinity of the Simpsons because they predicted a Trump presidency in one of their episodes. If they Simpsons were not gods, how could such a prediction come true?
Interesting article...
Yesterday I posted a number of scientific consistencies found in the Old Testament. While I think there are good reasons why God might not reveal advanced scientific details in Scripture, I do expect God’s Word to be scientifically consistent with the world we experience. One interesting scientific consistency seems to exist in ...[text shortened]... p://coldcasechristianity.com/2013/is-the-astronomy-in-the-book-of-job-scientifically-consistent/
Originally posted by @vivifyYou’re aware of the prophecy in Daniel 9?
A similar argument could be made for the divinity of the Simpsons because they predicted a Trump presidency in one of their episodes. If they Simpsons were not gods, how could such a prediction come true?
Don't forget that many biblical claims (Global Flood, universe created in six days, etc.) have been disproven.
Originally posted by @romans1009Bingo: that's what you're doing with this passage in Job claiming it's predicts something scientific.
I think you’re confusing coincidence with prophecy
Originally posted by @vivifyI’m not saying that at all. I’m saying it’s an accurate (though simplistic) representation of the earth at a time when (I believe) other religions and mythology held the earth rested on the back of a tortoise or was supported by Atlas’ shoulders. The idea that something could exist in the air or space without visible means of support I think was quite foreign back then.
Bingo: that's what you're doing with this passage in Job claiming it's predicts something scientific.