Spirituality
30 Dec 11
Originally posted by googlefudgeYou are not an expert in biology or abiogenesis or evolution either.
I think was that his point had nothing whatsoever to do with biology or abiogenesis or evolution.
All subjects in which Stephen hawking is not expert.
Even when we quote experts in micrbiology who believe in and support
intelligent design you will not accept it because it disagrees with your
beliefs. So you seem like a hypocrite or a hippopotamus. HaHa 😀
Originally posted by RJHindsNo I am not an expert in evolutionary biology. I have never claimed to be.
You are not an expert in biology or abiogenesis or evolution either.
Even when we quote experts in micrbiology who believe in and support
intelligent design you will not accept it because it disagrees with your
beliefs. So you seem like a hypocrite or a hippopotamus. HaHa 😀
I do however understand the basics of how evolution works and can understand and
evaluate the evidence for it.
I also can reference the vast body of work done by people who are experts in the field,
and the massive overwhelming majority of biologists who do accept evolution and the
many high profile experts on this subject.
I know and can reference quite enough to dismiss and refute any so called 'expert' you
have and can quote. As can any number of others on this site.
And I know more than enough about the scientific method and of rationality and reason
to be able to dismiss creationism as religion and not science.
You have not yet, (and can't) provided any rebuttal let alone refutation of my arguments
for why creationism can never be considered science.
Unless and until such a time as you do manage to refute my argument that creationism (ID)
is not science (which is impossible, but feel free not to take my word for that and try anyway)
then it doesn't matter how much you futilely attack evolution, creationism still wont be a viable
alternative.
Originally posted by googlefudgeAll this information must be stored in that big arse of yours. 😏
No I am not an expert in evolutionary biology. I have never claimed to be.
I do however understand the basics of how evolution works and can understand and
evaluate the evidence for it.
I also can reference the vast body of work done by people who are experts in the field,
and the massive overwhelming majority of biologists who do accept evolut ...[text shortened]... er how much you futilely attack evolution, creationism still wont be a viable
alternative.
Originally posted by RJHindsAhh I see where you are going wrong.
All this information must be stored in that big arse of yours. 😏
Information is stored in your brain which is located inside your head and not in your arse.
If you have been trying to insert information into your arse this might explain why you are so ignorant.
Originally posted by googlefudgeaha! now i see why he can never get around to reading any books...he's too busy trying to shove them up his ..er... sitting on them.
Ahh I see where you are going wrong.
Information is stored in your brain which is located inside your head and not in your arse.
If you have been trying to insert information into your arse this might explain why you are so ignorant.
Originally posted by RJHindsIt looks to me like you don't know that much about thermodynamics either, BTU is a unit of energy, HP is a unit of power, you have to state BTU per unit of time to get hp. So your problem is bollux.
Here is a simple Thermodynamics problem for you. second LAW.
A crane is operated by a 15 hp gas engine. Taking into account the heat
lost by friction in the crane, THE EFFICIENCY OF THE ENGINE IS 20%. If
the combustion value of the gas is 600 BTU per cubic foot, how many
cubic feet of gas must be used to lift 3000 pounds through a height of
60 feet?