Creation Answer Book

Creation Answer Book

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
11 Jan 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
Isn't this Stephen Hawking a science genius?
I think was that his point had nothing whatsoever to do with biology or abiogenesis or evolution.
All subjects in which Stephen hawking is not expert.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
11 Jan 12

Originally posted by googlefudge
I think was that his point had nothing whatsoever to do with biology or abiogenesis or evolution.
All subjects in which Stephen hawking is not expert.
You are not an expert in biology or abiogenesis or evolution either.
Even when we quote experts in micrbiology who believe in and support
intelligent design you will not accept it because it disagrees with your
beliefs. So you seem like a hypocrite or a hippopotamus. HaHa 😀

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
11 Jan 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are not an expert in biology or abiogenesis or evolution either.
Even when we quote experts in micrbiology who believe in and support
intelligent design you will not accept it because it disagrees with your
beliefs. So you seem like a hypocrite or a hippopotamus. HaHa 😀
No I am not an expert in evolutionary biology. I have never claimed to be.

I do however understand the basics of how evolution works and can understand and
evaluate the evidence for it.

I also can reference the vast body of work done by people who are experts in the field,
and the massive overwhelming majority of biologists who do accept evolution and the
many high profile experts on this subject.

I know and can reference quite enough to dismiss and refute any so called 'expert' you
have and can quote. As can any number of others on this site.

And I know more than enough about the scientific method and of rationality and reason
to be able to dismiss creationism as religion and not science.

You have not yet, (and can't) provided any rebuttal let alone refutation of my arguments
for why creationism can never be considered science.

Unless and until such a time as you do manage to refute my argument that creationism (ID)
is not science (which is impossible, but feel free not to take my word for that and try anyway)
then it doesn't matter how much you futilely attack evolution, creationism still wont be a viable
alternative.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
11 Jan 12

Originally posted by googlefudge
No I am not an expert in evolutionary biology. I have never claimed to be.

I do however understand the basics of how evolution works and can understand and
evaluate the evidence for it.

I also can reference the vast body of work done by people who are experts in the field,
and the massive overwhelming majority of biologists who do accept evolut ...[text shortened]... er how much you futilely attack evolution, creationism still wont be a viable
alternative.
All this information must be stored in that big arse of yours. 😏

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
11 Jan 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
All this information must be stored in that big arse of yours. 😏
Ahh I see where you are going wrong.

Information is stored in your brain which is located inside your head and not in your arse.

If you have been trying to insert information into your arse this might explain why you are so ignorant.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
11 Jan 12

Originally posted by googlefudge
Ahh I see where you are going wrong.

Information is stored in your brain which is located inside your head and not in your arse.

If you have been trying to insert information into your arse this might explain why you are so ignorant.
That's funny. Good one. 😀

V

Windsor, Ontario

Joined
10 Jun 11
Moves
3829
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by googlefudge
Ahh I see where you are going wrong.

Information is stored in your brain which is located inside your head and not in your arse.

If you have been trying to insert information into your arse this might explain why you are so ignorant.
aha! now i see why he can never get around to reading any books...he's too busy trying to shove them up his ..er... sitting on them.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
aha! now i see why he can never get around to reading any books...he's too busy trying to shove them up his ..er... sitting on them.
Now you two are getting funny. I enjoy humor, even when the joke is
on me. That is, if it is not done in to hateful ways. 😀

V

Windsor, Ontario

Joined
10 Jun 11
Moves
3829
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
Now you two are getting funny. I enjoy humor, even when the joke is
on me. That is, if it is not done in to hateful ways. 😀
we all love you ron, even if you're like the halfwit cousin.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
we all love you ron, even if you're like the halfwit cousin.
"The halfwit cousin" - Sounds like you are trying to get ugly now.
I am far from being a halfwit. You numbnut. 😞

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
Isn't this Stephen Hawking a science genius?
He has an extraordinary intellect no doubt, but I still don't see why you put the link there. Does it support your "god did it" position?

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by VoidSpirit
we all love you ron, even if you're like the halfwit cousin.
When you say 'we'....

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
When you say 'we'....
No he could not have been including you. You don't even know the
meaning of the word.

a
Not actually a cat

The Flat Earth

Joined
09 Apr 10
Moves
14988
12 Jan 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
No he could not have been including you. You don't even know the
meaning of the word.
I'm looking for a smiley with one raised eyebrow but I can't find it...

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
14 Jan 12

Originally posted by RJHinds
Here is a simple Thermodynamics problem for you. second LAW.

A crane is operated by a 15 hp gas engine. Taking into account the heat
lost by friction in the crane, THE EFFICIENCY OF THE ENGINE IS 20%. If
the combustion value of the gas is 600 BTU per cubic foot, how many
cubic feet of gas must be used to lift 3000 pounds through a height of
60 feet?
It looks to me like you don't know that much about thermodynamics either, BTU is a unit of energy, HP is a unit of power, you have to state BTU per unit of time to get hp. So your problem is bollux.