Originally posted by RJHinds
I wanted to know if I should take you seriously. However, I am an American
so there is no need to convert it to metric, you can just give me the answer
in cubic feet as I asked using the British Thermal Unit (BTU) I gave you.
Very simple calculation that way.
At my parents now.
I convert to metric because that is the internationally recognised SI units (which will be metres, kg, Joules, Watts) that I am used to. Physicists work with SI units all the time and I am not as familiar with imperial units. It is normal for a physicist to convert all units to SI before doing their calculations. Even in the US, physicists will work with SI units.
I guess you got the problem from some engineering book or source which are specific to this kind of work and it is normal to work with BTU, pounds and cubic feet and certainly the standard formulae normally used will be simple with those units. However, with my background that is very unusual to me.
I certainly can calculate the answer in SI (in cubic metres) and convert that to cubic feet.
Although this is digressing as the argument is whether Don Batten (whose speciality is actually plant physiology) really understands thermodynamics.
Entropy does have overall increase in a
closed system (i.e. the entire universe, assuming there isn't influence from other systems). In subsystems, while there will be pockets of increasing entropy, others can lose entropy.