Originally posted by C Hess I spent ten minutes watching and responding to creationist propaganda at the indirect request of josephw, so I only think it's fair that you creationists watch and respond to this video, that exposes creationism for the falsehood it is, and demonstrates how it forces its defenders to lie and deceive. Without further ado, I give you AronRa's "How could creationism not be dishonest?":
http://tinyurl.com/n7fk7vj
Pure scientific sophistry.
But it was interesting to listen to. It was the best magic show I ever saw. Those who call themselves scientist have created a grand illusion indeed. But don't worry, the light of the truth will surely expose who is lying. Eventually.
You know, the beauty of this whole thing is is that I get to choose who to believe.
I believe God. Not some mortal with an arrogance issue cleverly disguise.
Originally posted by josephw Pure scientific sophistry.
But it was interesting to listen to. It was the best magic show I ever saw. Those who call themselves scientist have created a grand illusion indeed. But don't worry, the light of the truth will surely expose who is lying. Eventually.
You know, the beauty of this whole thing is is that I get to choose who to believe.
I believe God. Not some mortal with an arrogance issue cleverly disguise.
Let's be clear here Joe, you choose the writings of an unknown Bronze Age desert tribesman.
Originally posted by FreakyKBH Your wall of text notwithstanding, here's a few musings which were not copied and pasted--- excepting, of course, quoting and dissecting your annotated work.
[b]ID is a religious and not a scientific proposition." Is observation the main criterion for science?
Can something be both religious and scientific?
Moreover, defense expert Professor ...[text shortened]... g for all the right reasons.
They're still wrong, but that doesn't make their opposition right.
"They're still wrong, but that doesn't make their opposition right."
Originally posted by RJHinds There has still never been a single acceptable argument of evidence indicative of miraculous creation or biological evolution or any other avenue of actual science.
He's saying, you have the choice to remain honest or remain creationist, because "there's still never been a single, verifiably accurate argument, of evidence indicative of miraculous creation over biological evolution, or any other avenue of actual science" for that matter.
I'm from Sweden, and I understand him perfectly. Perhaps it's this creationist hearing disability that prevents you from getting it? I'd look into that, if I were you.
As for this not being worth your intelligent effort, I'd have to disagree. Your intelligent effort would be a nice change of pace.
Originally posted by Dasa Why do you think there is only one creation story..................given to us all by Christianity?
There is the false creation story and there is the true creation story.
The Vedas are presenting the true.
If you haven't figured out yet that Christianity is full of falsehoods then you are not sincere.
I figured out a long time ago that all religions are equalΕy unlikely to be true when they comment on reality. I have no idea what your creation story is, so I can't really comment on it though.
Originally posted by FreakyKBH Are there two people at your keyboard?
Or are you presuming to speak for some unnamed crowd?
Neither. I was suggesting that you tell us (anyone who reads this thread) what the mark actually is. I am the only reader at my keyboard and I was not speaking on behalf of any other reader.
Creationism smack-down!
01 Nov '14 23:35
Back to Top