13 Sep '07 03:02>1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyOk
Give me one example in which science has observed life coming from nonlife or science creating life from nonlife. If not, how can you say that science does not indicate that life comes from other life sources?
Scientists can compose a living organism (ultra-simple, only 100-200 genes) from proteins and other "non-living" material. The new artificial organism can reproduce itself, copy its genetic code, feed, well... just like a stupid simple bacteria.
Of course there's an ethical debate going on forbidding all this, because "only God is allowed to create life, so stop playing God". Of course this is a big punch in the stomach for all guys saying "god is essential to create life".
He is NOT. Life is not transcendental. You are not special. Life can be created from a bunch of elements (a huge bunch) in special conditions.
I guess your next step is to say "god created earth and the conditions so that life could be created from the bunch of complex elements that existed there, evolving through times by the hand of god, blablabla"