Originally posted by JS357 The woman is the vibrating plate and her hair is the sand. It's also her facial expressions. The visible effects of the auditory stimulus in the two cases are analogous.
Originally posted by josephw But you don't think those observations justify identifying that the universe was created?
How do you think that argument would go? Observations of certain regularities do not, on their own, justify any conclusions about the origins of the universe. You'll need some ancillary premises to get to the conclusion that the universe was created by an agent. What do you take those ancillary premises to be?
Originally posted by bbarr How do you think that argument would go? Observations of certain regularities do not, on their own, justify any conclusions about the origins of the universe. You'll need some ancillary premises to get to the conclusion that the universe was created by an agent. What do you take those ancillary premises to be?
"Certain regularities" meaning the look of design? That the universe appears designed doesn't justify it was created? You need more proof?