Dasa and the thought police

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I don't think that calling for the genocide of all Muslims was in any way a reality, it was a nothing more than a kind of grotesque apocalyptic fantasy and I rejected those who tried to justify it on the basis that it could have been carried out. It was nonsense to think so. Duchess64's attempted vilification was being carried out and her nefarious ...[text shortened]... I am quite sure that advocating genocide for every Muslim challenges prevailing perceptions sir.

You're such a sock.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
whut? you thought tyrant!

I fully admitted earlier in the thread that I do believe in policing thoughts. I am honest about it. You on the other hand lie about it. But that is hardly news.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
It was nonsense to think so. Duchess64's attempted vilification was being carried out and her nefarious machinations were very real and thereon lies the difference.

Duchess64 accused you of being a liar and a hypocrite. On this thread alone, haven't you demonstrated that both of these things are true? The claims that Dasa made about Muslims and about some posters here supporting terrorism were not true, and yet you defended him.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
You're such a sock.

A sock? how quaint!

Originally posted by FMF
Duchess64 accused you of being a liar and a hypocrite. On this thread alone, haven't you demonstrated that both of these things are true? The claims that Dasa made about Muslims and about some posters here supporting terrorism were not true, and yet you defended him.

Duchess64 accuses lots of people of being liars and hypocrites to the point where its quite meaningless, but she was not banned for that, oh no, she was banned for something far more sinister.

-Removed-

really? how distasteful and to think he was masquerading as a gentleman 😲

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Duchess64 accuses lots of people of being liars and hypocrites to the point where its quite meaningless, but she was not banned for that, oh no, she was banned for something far more sinister.

Did she call for genocide?!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Duchess64 accuses lots of people of being liars and hypocrites to the point where its quite meaningless, but she was not banned for that, oh no, she was banned for something far more sinister.

If it is meaningless, as you say, why did you alert it and seek to have Duchess64 banned? You have suggested that Dasa's sinister hatespeech was effectively meaningless too on account of it being his fantasy, and yet you defended him.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Did she call for genocide?!

No she attempted to use vile insinuations to defame and vilify another user with a very serious allegation of being a rape apologist. Not quite the same as calling for a genocide that would in all probability never take place and which existed only in the mind of its creator but insidious enough to have her ignominiously thrown out of the forum and into the cooler to learn humility. Yet strangely enough all her dogs still seem to be howling out of key as the little caravan trundles on. Ironic that they were so vocal in raising their voices against a fantasy scenario but seem intent to defend a real malicious action. Perhaps they also believe that the violence in films is real?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No she attempted to use vile insinuations to defame and vilify another user with a very serious allegation of being a rape apologist. Not quite the same as calling for a genocide that would in all probability never take place and which existed only in the mind of its creator but insidious enough to have her ignominiously thrown out of the forum and i ...[text shortened]... o defend a real malicious action. Perhaps they also believe that the violence in films is real?

I didn't read her comments, so have no stance.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
I didn't read her comments, so have no stance.

tis the course of wisdom but you do realise that it makes you by your own standards 'a Wendy'

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No she attempted to use vile insinuations to defame and vilify another user with a very serious allegation of being a rape apologist.

But you have been steadfast ~ on this forum ~ in your denial that there is even such a thing as rape when a man forces his wife to have sexual intercourse against her will and you have been steadfast in your defence of the cover up of the rape of children in your organization whilst seeking to downplay its incidence and even to discredit the testimony of such victims of rape.

Perhaps Duchess64 justifiably thought you had a case to answer, and yet despite everything you have argued on this thread, you sought (and succeeded) in getting Duchess64 silenced and the accusations deleted rather than addressing or refuting them.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Ironic that they were so vocal in raising their voices against a fantasy scenario but seem intent to defend a real malicious action.

Do you not think that hate speech is a "malicious action"? You yourself have stated that Dasa's texts constituted a hate crime.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
No she attempted to use vile insinuations to defame and vilify another user with a very serious allegation of being a rape apologist.

Dasa's claims that another user was a supporter of terrorism was an attempt "to use vile insinuations to defame and vilify another user with a very serious allegation" and yet you defended Dasa.