2 edits
Originally posted by FMFAnother vain and feeble attempt, I have not defended Dasa's vilification of anyone nor his genocidal claims, infact what I have stated is that his claims regarding genocide are fantasy on the basis that they could not have been realistically carried out. If you cannot grasp this concept then I don't hold out much hope for you but these cardboard cut-out atesticular fingerpointing whinings of a gelding are pure hyperWendy! Please do us a favour and change your handle to Wendy.
Dasa's claims that another user was a supporter of terrorism was an attempt "to use vile insinuations to defame and vilify another user with a very serious allegation" and yet you defended Dasa.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou condemned posters for alerting his posts, criticised the mods for banning him, and started this thread to defend his freedom of expression.
Another vain and feeble attempt, I have not defended Dasa's vilification of anyone nor his genocidal claims, infact what I have stated is that his claims regarding genocide are fantasy on the basis that they could not have been realistically carried out.
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFI have not described all his posts as hate crime nor have I defended them all - please try another approach your feeble attempts are Wendy. Furthermore even those accused of hate crimes have the right to a defence but i don't expect a cardboard cut out moralizing gelding like you to appreciate the fact.
You have described his posts as "hate crime" and you have defended them nevertheless.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou said:
I have not described all his posts as hate crime nor have I defended them all - please try another approach your feeble attempts are Wendy.
"Have I not stated that his texts constitute a hate crime?"
And...
"If you read the thread you will see that I fully acknowledged that Dasa had committed a crime."
Originally posted by FMFare those who are accused of hate crimes allowed a defence or are they not, if they are then what are you whining about?
You said:
"Have I not stated that his texts constitute a hate crime?"
And...
"If you read the thread you will see that I fully acknowledged that Dasa had committed a crime."
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou defended his hate speech even though it is a "malicious action". Given your stance on the first however many pages of this thread, why did you not defend Duchess64?
I have already explained the basis for my defence if you are having difficultly understand what a fantasy defence is then i suggest you seek help.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieYou condemned posters for alerting his posts even though they were not alerted for being "fantasy", and you criticised the mods for banning him even though he was banned for hate speech and not for "fantasy".
I have already explained the basis for my defence if you are having difficultly understand what a fantasy defence is then i suggest you seek help.
1 edit
Originally posted by FMFI am defending his right to a defence. What is it about that you are having difficulty with? look at your attempts to dishonestly distort reality, all you have is slimey insinuations and feeble attempts to extract some kind of moral leverage based on plastic transparent loaded questions. Look at you, you are a sham, a charlatan, a mere trickster.
So you are defending his hate crimes then?