Originally posted by Zahlanzi
when will you and everyone else(like you) finally get it? evolution is only "the change over time in one or more inherited traits found in populations of organisms"(wiki). it isn't explaining how or why life began. an intelligent creator is not incompatible with evolution. you only wish your creator used magic to bring the world to be as opposed to a billio ...[text shortened]... e evolutionists who call you on your lack of understanding of the theory you argue against.
The definition of evolution keeps changing over time and has
different meanings depending on who is using it and in what
context it is being used. They now have microevolution and
macroevolution to confuse the issue. So the degree of change
and how the change takes place is always the issue. If everyone
who says they believe in evolution could agree on a definition and
stick to it, we could discuss it more reasonably. However, this is
not the case and I don't see it happening anytime in the near future.
What was once called adaptation is now considered evolution to many.
The same goes for mutations, if it is believed to be of some benefit to
an organism. Loss of a function is sometimes considered evolution by
some. In order not to be accused of believing in something I don't, I
always say, I don't believe in evolution, period. My stand is that any
change can be explained in some other term, since the term "evolution"
can be so misleading.