Debate with Darfius No 3 Gods Existence

Originally posted by ivanhoe

I know Captain Jerk ...... 🙄

Do you have something to contribute to this thread? This thread has the potential to be very informative and stimulating. I have not berated anyone and have even indulged one participate in this thread who asked about my mother's sex life. Do you have somthing to contribute either to the topic of Jesus' humanity or my mother's sex life? If you do, I invite you to share openly instead of berating me.

Originally posted by kirksey957
Do you have something to contribute to this thread? This thread has the potential to be very informative and stimulating. I have not berated anyone and have even indulged one participate in this thread who asked about my mother's sex life. Do you have somthing to contribute either to the topic of Jesus' humanity or my mother's sex life? If you do, I invite you to share openly instead of berating me.

You're too good for this world Kirkie ...... 😛

Originally posted by Nemesio
Um. The idea that Jesus was married dates long before Dan Brown.
Indeed, the Gospel of Mary Magdelene which dates from the 3rd century
discusses Jesus's kissing of her in a rather sexual way.

Unlike pcaspian, I do not take any offense at the idea. Whether Jesus
was married or not makes no theological difference whatsoever.

Nemesio

Thank you , Nemesio, for I am glad you got us back on topic. Could you say a little bit about why it makes no theological difference to you.

Originally posted by kirksey957
By all means. If there is something you know about it and if it can edify this thread, please give your input.

Neah, I don't know anything about it, but neither do you about Jesus, yet that doesn't stop you debating his sexlife. As you know your mom best, why don't you start.

Originally posted by Nemesio
Um. The idea that Jesus was married dates long before Dan Brown.
Indeed, the Gospel of Mary Magdelene which dates from the 3rd century
discusses Jesus's kissing of her in a rather sexual way.

Unlike pcaspian, I do not take any offense at the idea. Whether Jesus
was married or not makes no theological difference whatsoever.

Nemesio

So Mary Magdeline, who was a contemporary of Jesus, wrote a Gospel about Jesus kissing her in the 3rd century? Those must have been some magical kisses.

Nemesio: " Whether Jesus was married or not makes no theological difference whatsoever."

....... Huna huna huna hop hop hop ...... I don't believe this.

Who says it doesn't make any difference theologically ?

Originally posted by ivanhoe


Captain Jerk: " Christians are sooooo preoccupied with sex ........ "🙄

Ahem

Titus 3 1-2😉

Originally posted by kirksey957
Thank you , Nemesio, for I am glad you got us back on topic. Could you say a little bit about why it makes no theological difference to you.

Well, what I said was 'it makes no theological difference.'

What I mean is, in terms of Jesus's teachings or those Scriptures
which were directly inspired by Him (i.e., the canonized NT),
Jesus's being married does not impact them.

That is, when He says, 'Feed my lambs,' His being single or married
doesn't change the impact of that statement.

Nemesio

Originally posted by Darfius
So Mary Magdeline, who was a contemporary of Jesus, wrote a Gospel about Jesus kissing her in the 3rd century? Those must have been some magical kisses.

Yes, part of the Gnostic Gospels. These certainly have some historical value and I encourage you to read some of Elaine Pagels' work on this.

Originally posted by Darfius
So Mary Magdeline, who was a contemporary of Jesus, wrote a Gospel about Jesus kissing her in the 3rd century? Those must have been some magical kisses.

No, just like the other Gospels, it was written pseudonomynously.

My point, Darfius, is that Dan Brown has nothing to do with the
debate. The debate started long, long ago.

Nemesio

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Who says it doesn't make any difference theologically ?

(I have a feeling I am wasting my breath...)

Why do you think it makes a difference theologically?

Nemesio

Originally posted by Nemesio
No, just like the other Gospels, it was written pseudonomynously.

My point, Darfius, is that Dan Brown has nothing to do with the
debate. The debate started long, long ago.

Nemesio

(DID YOU MEAN : pseudonymously ? )

Hehe, Nemesio got OWNED by Darfius ... LOL.

gnight all. weekend time. Don't spent too much time infront of the P C🙂

Originally posted by pcaspian
Hehe, Nemesio got OWNED by Darfius ... LOL.

gnight all. weekend time. Don't spent too much time infront of the P C🙂

Further testament to your elementary-school reading comprehension
level. Thanks for the info!

Nemesio

Originally posted by pcaspian

gnight all. weekend time.

Same to you. If you think of any more great Site Ideas, be sure to pop in and post them. We'll see you after the Sabbath.

Originally posted by Nemesio
Further testament to your elementary-school reading comprehension
level. Thanks for the info!

Nemesio

O
W
N
E
D

🙂