Dependencies for 'Chrisitan' salvation

Originally posted by FMF
Which one? I think I've answered all your questions to the extent that have wanted to and without repeating myself or rehashing (retyping) stuff that I have discussed in thousands and thousands of previous posts.

There you go again, too proud to retype something that you supposedly typed in another thread?

Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk
There you go again, too proud to retype something that you supposedly typed in another thread?

My estimation of you [and decision] is being vindicated with each successive post by you on this matter. 😛

Originally posted by FMF
My estimation of you [and decision] is being vindicated with each successive post by you on this matter. 😛

Clearly your estimation of me doesn't really matter to me. 😛

Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk
Clearly your estimation of me doesn't really matter to me. 😛

I deduced this several days ago. I think you're cottoning on. At last.

Originally posted by FMF

Once more, because you brought it up (not me) and then took flight when asked about it. Be clear now. Are you - or are you not - claiming that the NWT translation of "EN ARCHE EN HO LOGOS, KAI HO LOGOS EN PROS TON THEON, KAI THEOS EN HO LOGOS" as 'In the beginning the Word was, and the Word was with God, and the Word was a god' is "accepted by most Bible scholars as the best translation available"?

Bump for roigam. I believe you have made a patently false claim. You are obviously trying to just brazen out but I reckon you ought to attempt to clarify.

Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk
Do you think the thief on the cross checked any of these boxes? If so which ones?

-need to be dying next to Jesus on cross.

Check!

-Removed-

Not sure what's the hold up. It's not as if you're talking to him in Koine Greek. 😛