10 May 07
Originally posted by RBHILLDid Kirk Cameron cite the big titties of his opponent in the debate as evidence of a creator?
Click in the Black video in the upper right.
RB, I could only take so much of that. If they are going to have a "scientific" debate or a debate at all, why not have it with people who have more in their background than being an actor.
10 May 07
1 edit
Originally posted by kirksey957That name Ray Comfort always cracks me up. Do you think that's his real name? Do you think it was a slip when Kirk called him "my partner"?
Did Kirk Cameron cite the big titties of his opponent in the debate as evidence of a creator?
RB, I could only take so much of that. If they are going to have a "scientific" debate or a debate at all, why not have it with people who have more in their background than being an actor.
11 May 07
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesThis is where you would have made a better moderator for that "debate." You could ask questions like if that was his real name and I certainly would have been a better representative of the Christian faith by talking about her voluptiousness instead of that stupid coke can. What the hell is wrong with Christians today?
That name Ray Comfort always cracks me up. Do you think that's his real name? Do you think it was a slip when Kirk called him "my partner"?
11 May 07
Originally posted by kirksey957it works on simpletons
This is where you would have made a better moderator for that "debate." You could ask questions like if that was his real name and I certainly would have been a better representative of the Christian faith by talking about her voluptiousness instead of that stupid coke can. What the hell is wrong with Christians today?