Originally posted by no1marauderWell this article is much easier for a non-english to read than the post from Villiger yesterday (in the thread "no title" ). If I'd get my hands on this version first, we could have avoided some unnecessary confusion.
We're finally going to get the answer.
Originally posted by Bosse de NageIf your lawyer talks like LH, I suggest you immediately report him to both the nearest disciplinary committee and mental health professional.
You might persuade lucifershammer. He's been talking like a lawyer of late.
As for the court case--Italy has a rich tradition of comic opera.
Originally posted by NicolaiSOh really?
You are comparing the historical fact of the existence of Hitler with the believe in Jesus ... ???? I thought I came across it all here, but this is THE new standard of idiocy.
Originally posted by DanielPasonoSpoken like a true sheep, specifically a lamb,
And how much research have you put into finding the truth about whether or not Jesus was a real man? How many hours have you spent reading opinions on both sides of the equations? How many historians have you read on the topic?
The existance of Jesus as a real human being is extremely well documented and only the pure denial of fact would ...[text shortened]... e to conclude elsewise. Assuming, of course, that one actually was interested in fact.
Originally posted by DanielPasonoNo, it isn't. It is based purely on secondary historical evidence (texts). The case for the existence of Krishna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is equally well documented. Can I interest you in some fascinating literature?
The existance of Jesus as a real human being is extremely well documented and only the pure denial of fact would lead someone to conclude elsewise.