Originally posted by RJHinds It would prove man and dinosaur lived at the same time. That would prove the science books wrong and the Holy Bible correct.
The Instructor
Where in the bible is anything written about dinosaurs?
To the Instructor, that is a mighty title, be carefull. I believe in many things, and ussually outside to box. It is written, one day is "LIKE" a 1000 years to God. Suddenly everyone is confused, and state, "Oh that means, one day IS a 1000 years to God." Please, give me a break. Show me the beginning and end of a circle. If you can't, and you won't, because there is no beginning or end, then you will understand, Time has No meaning to God.
Originally posted by Pudgenik To the Instructor, that is a mighty title, be carefull. I believe in many things, and ussually outside to box. It is written, one day is "LIKE" a 1000 years to God. Suddenly everyone is confused, and state, "Oh that means, one day IS a 1000 years to God." Please, give me a break. Show me the beginning and end of a circle. If you can't, and you won't, because there is no beginning or end, then you will understand, Time has No meaning to God.
Originally posted by joe beyser I think it is as they dug up the river bank exposing more tracks proving it was not a fake.
They did not, however, demonstrate that the 'human' footprints were actually human. In fact, if you choose to examine them yourself, you'll see that they're not actually very much like human footprints at all. Further, they correlate on a one-to-one basis with the dinosaur prints. This correlation and the uniform spacing pretty conclusively demonstrates that they're actually a part of the dinosaur prints themselves.
There were also some pretty obviously carved prints in the limestone at Paluxy. I'm not sure if any of these are still there, I do know that some have been removed.
Originally posted by avalanchethecat They did not, however, demonstrate that the 'human' footprints were actually human. In fact, if you choose to examine them yourself, you'll see that they're not actually very much like human footprints at all. Further, they correlate on a one-to-one basis with the dinosaur prints. This correlation and the uniform spacing pretty conclusively demonstra ...[text shortened]... at Paluxy. I'm not sure if any of these are still there, I do know that some have been removed.
There was at least one of the human footprints that was along side of the dinosaur footprints, so to conclude that the human footprints insde the dinosaur footprint is a part of that particular dinosaur seems ridiculous. There were also human handprints found with dinosaur footprints.
Originally posted by RJHinds There was at least one of the human footprints that was along side of the dinosaur footprints, so to conclude that the human footprints insde the dinosaur footprint is a part of that particular dinosaur seems ridiculous. There were also human handprints found with dinosaur footprints.
Human and dinosaur footprints together
http://www.dinosaurc14ages.com/footprints.htm
The Idiot
Nonsense. But then we've long since established that your critical faculties lack even remotely sound foundation, so your obviously errant belief here is no surprise.
Originally posted by avalanchethecat They did not, however, demonstrate that the 'human' footprints were actually human. In fact, if you choose to examine them yourself, you'll see that they're not actually very much like human footprints at all. Further, they correlate on a one-to-one basis with the dinosaur prints. This correlation and the uniform spacing pretty conclusively demonstra ...[text shortened]... at Paluxy. I'm not sure if any of these are still there, I do know that some have been removed.
Originally posted by Pudgenik about the guy dropping a micriphone down a hole. I know all things are possible, but this is more silly in my mind than truth.
Confirmation bias is powerful.
(I'll point out, for fun, that 'silly' does not mean untrue.)
Originally posted by avalanchethecat Nonsense. But then we've long since established that your critical faculties lack even remotely sound foundation, so your obviously errant belief here is no surprise.
It is NOT nonsense. That website shows pictures of the dinosaur footprints, the human footprints and handprint. The distance measured between the dinosaur footprints indicates the stride length of this animal was greater than the strides length of the 11 inch human footprints for sure. The stride length of the 16 inch human footprints was greater than the 11 inch footprint just as would be expected.
"The stride for the 11 inch person was about 18 inches from heel to heel and 30 inches for the human making the 16 inch long prints in the sketched trail of Figure 8. The stride for intersecting dinosaur (17 inch long from middle toe to heel) in Figure 5 was about 40 inches. Of course strides are not perfect either as someone may be walking slow or running but it gives a comparative idea of stride between the two species."
Dinosaurs Still Alive
08 Oct '13 01:13
Back to Top