Originally posted by FreakyKBH
The solid Scriptural footing to which you refer demands that only a superficial rendering be heard, while at the same time also requires a complete exclusion from all remaining Scripture--- often times in the words just prior to or immediately following the passages you cite.
As is consistent with God's method of conveying truth, one must be exposed to ...[text shortened]... I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why you would really care), start with Genesis 1:1-3.
so basically you ask him to start with the beginning of the bible and read it all, choose which verses he thinks you think support your ideas, all of this only for the joy of proving your point?
hey i love your manner of debating. here is another one:
My claim: The bible offers a clear view of Harry Potter's world of magic, and J.K. Rowling plagiarised it. To understand this, you "must be exposed to multiple passages of the Bible in order to get a true picture of even simple aspects" of this claim. "There is not one verse which points to the events I am describing: there are many which create a mosaic of the same."
However, if you really want to start digging in (although I cannot, for the life of me, figure out why you would really care), start with Genesis 1:1.