09 Jan '10 08:15>
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis "probability argument" is simply lifted word for word from Life -- How Did It Get Here? By Evolution or by Creation?. That's right: you are just a shameless plagiarist of inane Watchtower publications. You keep demonstrating this sad fact over and over on these boards.
Anyone who condemns something without having made an evaluation of it himself needs his bum felt, especially if he simply takes it upon trust from dubious sources, he is a gullible man, putting faith in every word!
The science of mathematical probability offers striking proof that the Genesis creation account must have come from a source with know ...[text shortened]... in the right order without getting the facts from somewhere is not realistic, nor scientific!!!
And Christ if this isn't the most idiotic argument ever. You're sure scraping the bottom of the barrel for arguments to plagiarize. To recap: one should think the account "must have come from a source with knowledge of the events", given that the account demonstrates some remarkable insight concerning relation of said events -- such as that "a beginning" should come at the beginning; and such as that land plants should appear after land. And what exactly does conceiving of an account that largely just accords with these and other idiot-proof considerations have to do with picking numbers at random from a box? Well, nothing, of course.
The argument is particularly asinine, even for a Watchtower publication.