@fmf saidI don't have time to answer questions posed by someone who doesn't answer questions.
We have no way of knowing. She may well do some or all of those things.
Can your idea of a Christian be any more pharisaical? Always judgemental.
Why are you being so judgemental about her?
Can your idea of a Christian be any more pharisaical? Always judgemental.
And now you call me "judgemental". Do you think this absolves you of being judgemental of Christians? No, it validates my contention. It's just some 5-year-old's wordplay.
@suzianne saidI thought you were being very judgemental about a fellow Christian - the woman in the article vivify posted - when you said this:
And now you call me "judgemental".
I find women like that abhorrent. Mindless contributors to the old ways. They help maintain the patriarchy. Traitors to the cause. And then this: When was the last time that woman fed a homeless person? Or gave them a place to stay off the street? Or arranged to get them vaccinated? Yeah, I thought so. What's her excuse? "My husband didn't let me"?
You don't think it's right to view this as you being judgemental?
1 edit
@fmf saidShort answer, no. I'm not going to bother giving you a longer answer, since you won't bother to understand what I say because your agenda won't let you, either.
I thought you were being very judgemental about a fellow Christian - the woman in the article vivify posted - when you said this:
I find women like that abhorrent. Mindless contributors to the old ways. They help maintain the patriarchy. Traitors to the cause. And then this: When was the last time that woman fed a homeless person? Or gave them a place to stay off the ...[text shortened]... My husband didn't let me"?
You don't think it's right to view this as you being judgemental?
Sorry, I refuse to give your agenda any more of my limited time.
@suzianne saidYou seemed to be very judgemental about the woman in the article vivify posted. And then, at the same time, you seem to be saying you are against people being judgemental.
Short answer, no. I'm not going to bother giving you a longer answer, since you won't bother to understand what I say because your agenda won't let you, either.Sorry, I refuse to give your agenda any more of my limited time.
@suzianne saidThis is very peculiar stuff you have typed here, as was the stuff you said in your earlier reply to me. The ends you go to in order to dodge things ~ with peculiar rambling about people's agendas and their inability or unwillingness to understand you ~ simply draws attention to the fact that you are dodging.
You would think so.No, that's not a general 'you', I mean you. In fact, one might say you were forced by your agenda to say so, even if you don't think so.Why must I constantly have to explain myself to people who have absolutely zero interest in understanding what I say?