Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow I agree, everything is relative. Not only do people generally matter more to me than the dark matter of the vacuum, but some people certainly mean a lot more to me than others. I was speaking in the larger sense which is how I thought this thread was talking about.
Yeah--I really understood what you meant: I was just bein' picky...😳
Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow Actually I'd like some bad luck with that. Thats the best advantage of your conspiracy mokko. Even if we know about it, we surrender anyway.
Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow Haven't you noticed how many of us are basically controlled by their wife or girlfriend. I would say half the male population would be considered whipped. I'm single for my own protection and the good of all of us.
I don't know what you mean by whipped, but as far as contolled
by my wife, no. It is taking her into all of my thoughts and plans
because I love her. There is a difference.
Kelly
…to whom? I mean, for something to matter—as in having import—it seems to me that it must matter to someone. In other words, “mattering” is a subjective matter. And I sincerely doubt that you do not have some “ranking” that reflects degrees of “mattering”—i.e., that some persons, creatures, things matter to you more than others.
And s ...[text shortened]... not—but such a question would presume that the cosmos is capable of having things matter to it.
Ecclesiastes 9:4 (New International Version)
4 Anyone who is among the living has hope —even a live dog is better off than a dead lion!
I think I'll have to read Ecclesiastes after I finish Daniel since this
book seems to have a lot of things I've been thinking about lately.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJay Ecclesiastes 9:4 (New International Version)
4 Anyone who is among the living has hope —even a live dog is better off than a dead lion!
I think I'll have to read Ecclesiastes after I finish Daniel since this
book seems to have a lot of things I've been thinking about lately.
Kelly
I have to read it again too. It seems to be a very deep and complex book, and used to be one of my favorites--even though it gets labelled as "pessimistic." But I think that's too simplistic a view...
BTW, how's the little one? Are you getting any sleep these days?
Originally posted by KellyJay I don't know what you mean by whipped, but as far as contolled
by my wife, no. It is taking her into all of my thoughts and plans
because I love her. There is a difference.
Kelly
That's the sweetest thing I have ever read. I hope to someday meet someone who will say sweet things like that about me. I would not poison him with my "special" ingredient.
Originally posted by vistesd I have to read it again too. It seems to be a very deep and complex book, and used to be one of my favorites--even though it gets labelled as "pessimistic." But I think that's too simplistic a view...
BTW, how's the little one? Are you getting any sleep these days?
Well she is healthy, growing, and is starting to develop a little
personality too. I thought we were done now I'm glad we weren't,
but we are now! No more surprises! 😳
I normally read a NT than an OT, but I do think I'll read Ecc next
after Daniel.
Originally posted by mokko That's the sweetest thing I have ever read. I hope to someday meet someone who will say sweet things like that about me. I would not poison him with my "special" ingredient.
😳 Thanks, she was worth the wait. She is better than I deserve!
Kelly
Originally posted by UmbrageOfSnow Who can say "Pseudoscience"?
And even if we forget about the "constituent field bs, if souls exist and were basically energy, energy doesn't curl up and become mass. Mass could be created but not like that.
oh my ,,Quantum field theory has been totally disproved by your statement.
jeez who woulda thunk.
02 Sep '05 04:15
Does man matter, or is he just matter?
Back to Top