Originally posted by sonhouse Well then, why do you defend that assshole Hovind?
I am not defending Hovind for being a tax fraud, if that is actually what he is. I am simply defending his right to have scientific opinions that most of which just happens to agree with my own. He is just more outspoken and a much better teacher on the subject than myself.
I alo do not see why he should be classified as an assshole. 😏
Originally posted by RJHinds I am not defending Hovind for being a tax fraud, if that is actually what he is. I am simply defending his right to have scientific opinions that most of which just happens to agree with my own. He is just more outspoken and a much better teacher on the subject than myself.
I alo do not see why he should be classified as an assshole. 😏
Not a better teacher, just more charismatic and able to attract a following based on his charisma having nothing to do with his politics or religious belief's. He could have been a real teacher if he hadn't let this creation crap spoil his intellect.
Originally posted by sonhouse Not a better teacher, just more charismatic and able to attract a following based on his charisma having nothing to do with his politics or religious belief's. He could have been a real teacher if he hadn't let this creation crap spoil his intellect.
So that makes him an "assshole" because he has a different opinion from you?
Originally posted by sonhouse If you label it opinion, we are all ok. Calling his level of BS truth is another thing.
Well, I feel the same way about you atheists calling billions of years and the theory of evolution where apes became humans truth. That is the real BS.
Originally posted by RJHinds Well, I feel the same way about you atheists calling billions of years and the theory of evolution where apes became humans truth. That is the real BS.
I have no problem with you saying Hovind is expressing his opinion.
"Dr" Hovind's ''dissertation'':
23 Apr '15 13:09
Back to Top