Originally posted by RJHinds
What is the truth? Why do they want to stop these women from wearing a
cross or crucifix.? I guess you live there and know all about it. I am just
stating the way I understand it. Tell us all about it please.
The truth is it's complicated.
It's a balancing act between freedom of expression (religious or otherwise) and anti-discrimination
laws and rights of employers to decide on the companies client facing image and the rights of
people not to have religion forced down their throats particularly when vulnerable.
And it's made more complicated by the nature of the legal framework the balancing act is taking place
in.
The government is not (as FMF keeps saying) trying to ban people from wearing crosses or any other
religious symbol at work. What they are doing is supporting the employers right to do so if the employer
sees fit.
This is obvious from the article in the telegraph.
Although the telegraph does print quite a lot of bull on the subject of religion.
It's not a particularly secular paper. (or accurate or truthful come to that)
(note secular here does not mean atheist, it's like your government is supposed to be according to the first amendment.
not making any laws or decisions based on or in favour of any religion so as to safeguard the religious freedoms of everyone
and not just whoever happens to be in a majority.)