01 May '13 09:01>
Geological evidence of creation
YouTube&NR=1&feature=fvwp
YouTube&NR=1&feature=fvwp
Originally posted by RJHindsNow the argument isn't over the age of the GC, but the layers underneath. Let's see you young Earthers rationalize that one. Just allowing for one moment your fantasy world of a GC only a few thousand years old.
Forming of the Grand Canyon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_TX95LAogY&feature=endscreen&NR=1
Originally posted by RJHindsWithout looking at your videos your direction seems to be that "Biblical Creation" is only your Young Earth Creation.
Geological evidence of creation
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=flrhqjN5BHo&NR=1&feature=fvwp
Originally posted by sonshipPerhaps you should have looked at the video first if you have eyes to see and ears to hear.
Without looking at your videos your direction seems to be that "Biblical Creation" is only your Young Earth Creation.
I reject that.
I would reject this dogmatic position today as I would reject the insinuation that "Biblical Creation" is that the sun revolves around the earth.
It doesn't matter is religious structures insisted that Galileo was a ...[text shortened]... te.
So you cannot biblically insist that no prior time took place to Genesis 1:2 on.
Originally posted by sonhouseMt.St.Helen Volcanic Eruption: Does it Prove Creation or Evolution?
Now the argument isn't over the age of the GC, but the layers underneath. Let's see you young Earthers rationalize that one. Just allowing for one moment your fantasy world of a GC only a few thousand years old.
Originally posted by sonshipOf course. God was the witness to what was done at the creation, His word endures forever. If God said there was only 6 days in the creation of the physical heavens and earth and all life forms on the earth, who is man to say God is a liar? Man is the liar.
Okay. I'll look at it and probably enjoy it too.
I like some Young Earth science talks as far as being refreshing new considerations..., sometimes.
I think Kent Hovind can be entertaining.
But if this is science, this is man's invention. Right?
God knows all the facts.
If there is a conflict then something is being misinterpreted.
And that may be in our interpretation of what God's revelation said.
Originally posted by RJHindsI saw the video. It was very interesting.
Of course. God was the witness to what was done at the creation, His word endures forever. If God said there was only 6 days in the creation of the physical heavens and earth and all life forms on the earth, who is man to say God is a liar? Man is the liar.
Originally posted by sonshipNo, that is not possible from the literal reading of the text. These days are identified as traditional Jewish days that begin at evening, for it says evening and morning was the first day. This gives a specific time meaning to those days. It is different from saying "in the day God created the heavens and the earth" where the time period could be years.
I saw the video. It was very interesting.
But strictly speaking the Bible does not say there were only six days at the [b]creating.
The word used in regards to the six days in Exodus 20:11 is made not created.
"For in six days Jehovah made heaven and earth, the sea and all that is in them, and rested on the seventh day ..." (Exo. ...[text shortened]... s God made (as in preparing out of what is already there) the heavens and earth in six days.
Originally posted by RJHinds
No, that is not possible from the literal reading of the text. These days are identified as traditional Jewish days that begin at evening, for it says evening and morning was the first day. This gives a specific time meaning to those days. It is different from saying "in the day God created the heavens and the earth" where the time period could be years.
No, that is not possible from the literal reading of the text.
6213 - asah - ... a prim root; to do or make , in broadest sense and widest application (as follows): - accomplish, advance, appoint, apt, be at, become, bear, bestow, bring forth, bruise, be busy, ... have the charge of, commit, deal (with), deck, ... finish, fit, ... gather, get, go about, govern, grant ... bring to (pass), ... practice, prepare, provide, thoroughly, trim, work, yield, use ..."
1254 - bara ... a prim. root; to create to cut down ( a wood), select, create (creator) cut down, dispatch, do, make (fat) ..
These days are identified as traditional Jewish days that begin at evening, for it says evening and morning was the first day.
This gives a specific time meaning to those days. It is different from saying "in the day God created the heavens and the earth" where the time period could be years.
Originally posted by sonshipMost translations says the earth "was" and not "became" as your translation has it. The idea of the text is that God did not complete the earth and it was not ready for habitation at the end of the first day. The earth was covered with water and without any source of light and therefore God created light. There is no gap in time as some try to say with their "Gap Theory" of creation.No, that is not possible from the literal reading of the text.
What is not possible from the literal reading of the text ??
It is not possible that CREATE is not a word used in the definition of ASAH ?
Let's see if it is not possible that ASAH for (make) and BARA for (create) cannot have specific meanings which are not completely ...[text shortened]... .
That is true regardless of how you argue the length of the days in terms of hours.
Most translations says the earth "was" and not "became" as your translation has it.
The idea of the text is that God did not complete the earth and it was not ready for habitation at the end of the first day.
The earth was covered with water and without any source of light and therefore God created light. There is no gap in time as some try to say with their "Gap Theory" of creation.
On the second day God works on the heaven just above the earth before turning back to work more on completing and preparing the earth for habitation on the third day. By our modern count that would be a period of 72 hours.