The biggest win for the atheist propaganda machine is the existence of false religion. ( Islam Christianity and Judaism)
False religion with its false teachings have given atheism much credability - because picking on and defeating falsity is much easier than picking on and defeating truth.
This is why when Richard Dawkins debates with religion it is always with false religion - but if he ever debated true religious teachings he would not be successful and simply come across as foolish and ignorant.
False religion is easily defeated and false religion has done a great dis-service for theism.
Therefore false religion is directly implicated in propping up atheism.
Originally posted by Dasa The biggest win for the atheist propaganda machine is the existence of false religion. ( Islam Christianity and Judaism)
False religion with its false teachings have given atheism much credability - because picking on and defeating falsity is much easier than picking on and defeating truth.
This is why when Richard Dawkins debates with religion it is alwa ...[text shortened]... s-service for theism.
Therefore false religion is directly implicated in propping up atheism.
I think you turn people away from your religion. That is my honest opinion. Do you ever worry that you might be alienating people and that your 'I'm just telling you how it is, regardless of what you already erroneously believe' mission here is counterproductive? Have you ever paused to consider that?
Originally posted by Dasa The biggest win for the atheist propaganda machine is the existence of false religion. ( Islam Christianity and Judaism)
False religion with its false teachings have given atheism much credability - because picking on and defeating falsity is much easier than picking on and defeating truth.
This is why when Richard Dawkins debates with religion it is alwa ...[text shortened]... s-service for theism.
Therefore false religion is directly implicated in propping up atheism.
Originally posted by Dasa The biggest win for the atheist propaganda machine is the existence of false religion. ( Islam Christianity and Judaism)
False religion with its false teachings have given atheism much credability - because picking on and defeating falsity is much easier than picking on and defeating truth.
This is why when Richard Dawkins debates with religion it is alwa ...[text shortened]... s-service for theism.
Therefore false religion is directly implicated in propping up atheism.
I'm curious. Are you unable to leave your house and consider RHP your street corner?
Originally posted by Dasa The biggest win for the atheist propaganda machine is the existence of false religion. ( Islam Christianity and Judaism)
False religion with its false teachings have given atheism much credability - because picking on and defeating falsity is much easier than picking on and defeating truth.
This is why when Richard Dawkins debates with religion it is alwa ...[text shortened]... s-service for theism.
Therefore false religion is directly implicated in propping up atheism.
The biggest "win" for Athiesm is you and people like you.
You drive people away in droves from the religions your ilk purport to represent. If l believed in the Vedas l would consider you a mortal enemy for the damage you do with every utterance of bile from your mouth.
Originally posted by nook7 The biggest "win" for Athiesm is you and people like you.
You drive people away in droves from the religions your ilk purport to represent. If l believed in the Vedas l would consider you a mortal enemy for the damage you do with every utterance of bile from your mouth.
Edit - whackjob
It is natural for atheists to get angry when they become exposed for their nonsense false teachings.
The ones that become the most angry are the ones that are the most dishonest.
Some atheists who are given true knowledge do not get angry because they are to some degree honest and have common sense - and as a result of their honesty and common sense they sooner or later give up their atheism.
Originally posted by Dasa It is natural for atheists to get angry when they become exposed for their nonsense false teachings.
Atheists aside, I would say that you have a very dismal rapport with theists as well, Dasa. Do you think you have "succeeded" in any significant way in this community?
Originally posted by Dasa It is natural for atheists to get angry when they become exposed for their nonsense false teachings.
The ones that become the most angry are the ones that are the most dishonest.
Some atheists who are given true knowledge do not get angry because they are to some degree honest and have common sense - and as a result of their honesty and common sense they sooner or later give up their atheism.
It is natural for any sane rational being to be angry when confronted with such an assault on logic and reason that you continue to deliver.
l would say your friends must be proud of you but that would of course mean that you would have to have friends and given the garbage that you spew that would be an obvious logical impossibility.
Join the dots einstein - Dasa = spouter of lies = uber troll = whackjob = message fails to be received = yes - blame the messenger = back to the drawing board
since we are moving out of the law of karma and into the law of grace, dont you guys think, that in the interests of the impending new age, that we should stop blaming period?
Originally posted by karoly aczel since we are moving out of the law of karma and into the law of grace, dont you guys think, that in the interests of the impending new age, that we should stop blaming period?
it's a slippery slope.
Does this mean we should stop blaming serial murderers, tax evaders, members of Congress? I think not. Can't do the time? Don't do the crime. Period.
Originally posted by Dasa The biggest win for the atheist propaganda machine is the existence of false religion. ( Islam Christianity and Judaism)
False religion with its false teachings have given atheism much credability - because picking on and defeating falsity is much easier than picking on and defeating truth.
This is why when Richard Dawkins debates with religion it is alwa ...[text shortened]... s-service for theism.
Therefore false religion is directly implicated in propping up atheism.
Are you up out going life green backward banana, several axiomatic? Somewise in leaven smile accord is.
False religion is to blame.
13 Sep '11 02:12
Back to Top