Originally posted by SwissGambit
Bobby, note the bias of the page's author.Friedrich Nietzsche, pernicious philosopher who preached "God is dead"
Nietzsche died in spiritual darkness, a babbling madman. On a wall in Austria a graffiti said, "God is dead, --Nietzsche!"
Someone else wrote under it, "Nietzsche is dead! --God."
(See picture for proof!)
Pernicious? And the lame comeback on behalf of 'God'? Please. Give me a source I can actually take seriously.
"The life of David Hume" (1 of 3) Download audio; [show transcript] Saturday 23 April 2011 1:35PM
"A conversation with Roderick Graham, Hume's most recent biographer, about how a boy brought up in rural Scotland became a major figure in European thought. Transcript":
"Alan Saunders: The man whom I think was the greatest philosopher ever to write in the English language was born on 7 May 1711. He was part of the Scottish Enlightenment, an extraordinary outburst of intellectual energy in a small, remote and provincial part of northern Europe. More to the point, he set for subsequent philosophers an agenda that they're still working through. His issues are our issues. His name was David Hume and we're celebrating the 300th birthday of this incomparably great man by devoting four editions of The Philosopher's Zone to his life and work.
Hello, I'm Alan Saunders.
Alan Saunders: We're beginning with David Hume the man and his life and times. And I'm delighted to be joined by his most recent biographer, Roderick Graham, author of The Great Infidel: A Life of David Hume. He, like Hume, is a Scot and he joins us now from Edinburgh. Roderick, welcome to The Philosopher's Zone.
Roderick Graham: Thank you very much, I'm glad to be here.
Alan Saunders: Let's begin at the beginning. What was Hume's background, and how was he brought up and educated? Did he read the great philosophers of the day, even just do it from scratch?
Roderick Graham: He certainly read the great philosophers of the past. Most importantly I think, he read a man called Pierre Bayle who wrote a book called The Critical History, and Critical History really founded the whole school of scepticism. But Hume read it, and it undoubtedly laid the foundations for his scepticism, for his rejecting all the accepted dogmas and all the accepted teachings, and starting again from scratch. And that is a mighty thing to undertake even if you are a PhD student at a university. If you're alone in a farmhouse, with a brother and sister and mother, father is dead, the only person who's not earning and you're indulging yourself in studying and creating a philosophy all of your own,
Hume suffered guilt all his life from the fact that he was supported by his family while he earned absolutely nothing at all.
Alan Saunders: One of the points that you make in your book is that this challenging of the established philosophy and the established religion of the time, did come at something of an emotional cost to him, didn't it? He suffered.
Roderick Graham: Oh yes, not only emotional but a physical cost. I mean he had a full-blown nervous breakdown, we would say today. A local doctor smiled and said, 'You have acquired the disease of the learned', something unknown to us really. He suffered from scurvy, he got spots and blisters on his hands, he over-salivated, he had violent headaches. He was recommended drinking a pint of claret a day and taking exercise, which he did by riding. He was losing weight and once he started on the claret wine, and once he started riding, he start to put on weight again, but he did drive himself into a physical and mental corner, and fought his way out of it again, and realised then that he had to do something really crucial with everything that he'd gained. He was already making notes for the treatise, which he finally wrote.
Alan Saunders: And the style in which he writes is very striking, isn't it? I certainly find it very attractive. You say that it's the style of one who is talking, rather than expounding.
Roderick Graham: Yes, I think that's true. It's a very attractive style, it makes it very easy to read except that I keep wanting to interrupt him and say 'Can we go back a bit there David?' But it is a very easy book to read because of this rather chatty style.
Alan Saunders: I'm really interested that you say that you want to say 'Can we go back a bit, David?' because you want to think of him as 'David', don't you? I mean it's very personal and you do feel drawn to him as a person, even as you read his most abstract philosophical works.
Roderick Graham: Yes. One of the great things that I would love to have done would be to spend an evening with David Hume, probably more than anybody else. I doubt, in fact if my liver could stand it. This was the 18th century, they were monumental drinkers, and Hume was no laggard in putting the glass down empty.
Alan Saunders: Now Hume said that the treatise, which as I said was he wrote at the age of 26, and was published in 1739, he said that it fell 'dead-born from the press.' Was its reception really that bad?
Roderick Graham: No. Nothing like that. He had nearly killed himself, he'd produced what he regarded as an absolutely groundbreaking work of philosophy, and he imagined that the morning after it was published, he would be on every chat-show, on every television station in the world; he would be instantly world-famous. Of course he wasn't. This depressed him greatly. In fact there's a letter from a friend of his writing after the event saying at the time the treatise was published in Edinburgh it was the talking point of every dinner party in town. It was a slow burner; it became famous in Europe, then it became famous in Britain, but it wasn't the instant best-seller that Hume hoped it would be."
http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/philosopherszone/the-life-of-david-hume/3005356#transcript