Go back
Finally! Kent Hovind accepts evolution!

Finally! Kent Hovind accepts evolution!

Spirituality

C Hess

Joined
31 Aug 06
Moves
40565
Clock
25 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Well, apparently he did several years ago, but I missed it.

Potholer and Hovind Come Together (Not like that!):

😲

O

Joined
22 Sep 07
Moves
48406
Clock
25 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by C Hess
Well, apparently he did several years ago, but I missed it.

Potholer and Hovind Come Together (Not like that!): https://youtu.be/l-ilMYc5xdQ

😲
Thanks really enjoyed that. 🙂

rc

Joined
26 Aug 07
Moves
38239
Clock
25 Mar 15
1 edit

Originally posted by C Hess
Well, apparently he did several years ago, but I missed it.

Potholer and Hovind Come Together (Not like that!): https://youtu.be/l-ilMYc5xdQ

😲
Young earth creationists are whack jobs, why should this be any different.

C Hess

Joined
31 Aug 06
Moves
40565
Clock
25 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by OdBod
Thanks really enjoyed that. 🙂
Potholer54 is one of the most brilliant youtubers I've seen. His series on global warming is a must see, if you haven't seen it already.

Anyway, I can only imagine what goes on inside the creationist mind when it reflects on this.

Sure, there's variation within kinds. That's not evolution, that's micro-evolution - a totally different thing. 😏

Yes, this variation can lead to two or more groups within the same kind not interbreeding, but they have a common ancestor, so technically they're still the same kind. 😏

Right, any animals of common ancestry are of the same kind, and how do we determine common ancestry? Well, that's easy, a five-year old can do it: anything that's not a banana. 😏

😕

Wait! No! 😲

O

Joined
22 Sep 07
Moves
48406
Clock
25 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by C Hess
Potholer54 is one of the most brilliant youtubers I've seen. His series on global warming is a must see, if you haven't seen it already.

Anyway, I can only imagine what goes on inside the creationist mind when it reflects on this.

Sure, there's variation within kinds. That's not evolution, that's micro-evolution - a totally different thing. 😏

Yes, ...[text shortened]... , that's easy, a five-year old can do it: anything that's not a banana. 😏

😕

Wait! No! 😲
I loved the suggestion that the Banana, Gorilla, Orangutan , Man experiment be put to a young creationist.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
25 Mar 15

Originally posted by C Hess
Well, apparently he did several years ago, but I missed it.

Potholer and Hovind Come Together (Not like that!): https://youtu.be/l-ilMYc5xdQ

😲
Potholer needs to take a course in logic because his logic is terrible. Potholer claims whales had feet. This is obviously not true, but it does not keep evolutionists from claiming this ridiculous idea just like they claim fish gained feet and crawled out on land and began breathing oxygen from air instead of water because their gills turned into lungs at the same time. This is just more evolution crap.

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
26 Mar 15

Originally posted by OdBod
I loved the suggestion that the Banana, Gorilla, Orangutan , Man experiment be put to a young creationist.
This is simply Potholer presenting a bad example to misrepresent Hovind's point in producing an illogical conclusion. Just because a gorilla, an oragutan, and a man all eats a banana does not mean that all but the banana are the same kind as evolutionists like Potholer seem to think. 😏

wolfgang59
Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48794
Clock
26 Mar 15

Originally posted by RJHinds
this ridiculous idea just like they claim fish gained feet and crawled out on land and began breathing oxygen from air instead of water because their gills turned into lungs at the same time.
As if anyone believes a fish with lungs!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bichir

RJHinds
The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
Clock
26 Mar 15
1 edit

Originally posted by wolfgang59
As if anyone believes a fish with lungs!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bichir
Don't most evolutionists believe this fish evolved the lungs instead of being created with lungs? 😏

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evolibrary/article/fishtree_09

C Hess

Joined
31 Aug 06
Moves
40565
Clock
26 Mar 15

Originally posted by RJHinds
Potholer needs to take a course in logic because his logic is terrible. Potholer claims whales had feet. This is obviously not true, but it does not keep evolutionists from claiming this ridiculous idea just like they claim fish gained feet and crawled out on land and began breathing oxygen from air instead of water because their gills turned into lungs at the same time. This is just more evolution crap.
Don't be mad at potholer. It is Hovind who says that two groups of non-interbreeding animals are still the same kind if they share common ancestry, and that common ancestry is determined by what isn't a banana.

Incidently, there's a good fossil record demonstrating that whale ancestors (not modern whales, nor bananas) had legs. If you want to close your eyes, cover your ears and sing la-la-la, that's fine, but it doesn't change the fossil record, I'm glad to say.

And no, gills never turned into lungs. Lungs evolved into the swimbladder in modern fish.

Your post is just more creationist crap.

C Hess

Joined
31 Aug 06
Moves
40565
Clock
26 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RJHinds
This is simply Potholer presenting a bad example to misrepresent Hovind's point in producing an illogical conclusion. Just because a gorilla, an oragutan, and a man all eats a banana does not mean that all but the banana are the same kind as evolutionists like Potholer seem to think. 😏
Way to miss the point there.

R
Acts 13:48

California

Joined
21 May 03
Moves
227555
Clock
26 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Young earth creationists are whack jobs, why should this be any different.
If one thing is wrong with God's word then you can't trust the Bible and he idiot!!!

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
26 Mar 15
1 edit

Originally posted by RBHILL
If one thing is wrong with God's word then you can't trust the Bible and he idiot!!!
True, but since there is no bible god (which is not to say it is impossible for there to be some kind of god out there) the whole thing is just another of the myriad of scams invented by those clever humans.

You know there is something fishy going on when the Miss Universe contest happens and someone from Earth wins EVERY TIME! It's a conspiracy I tell ya, a VAST atheistic conspiracy!

R
Acts 13:48

California

Joined
21 May 03
Moves
227555
Clock
26 Mar 15
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
True, but since there is no bible god (which is not to say it is impossible for there to be some kind of god out there) the whole thing is just another of the myriad of scams invented by those clever humans.

You know there is something fishy going on when the Miss Universe contest happens and someone from Earth wins EVERY TIME! It's a conspiracy I tell ya, a VAST atheistic conspiracy!
How about this if you think that the Bible is written by flawed man how can you trust any other books ever written? Or even any other idea?

Why are there millions of diet books? Why haven't they figured it out? One book is all you needed why have the other 999,999 health books?

O

Joined
22 Sep 07
Moves
48406
Clock
26 Mar 15

Creationists are the greatest asset to Atheism.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.