Originally posted by OdBodPotholer54 is one of the most brilliant youtubers I've seen. His series on global warming is a must see, if you haven't seen it already.
Thanks really enjoyed that. 🙂
Anyway, I can only imagine what goes on inside the creationist mind when it reflects on this.
Sure, there's variation within kinds. That's not evolution, that's micro-evolution - a totally different thing. 😏
Yes, this variation can lead to two or more groups within the same kind not interbreeding, but they have a common ancestor, so technically they're still the same kind. 😏
Right, any animals of common ancestry are of the same kind, and how do we determine common ancestry? Well, that's easy, a five-year old can do it: anything that's not a banana. 😏
😕
Wait! No! 😲
Originally posted by C HessI loved the suggestion that the Banana, Gorilla, Orangutan , Man experiment be put to a young creationist.
Potholer54 is one of the most brilliant youtubers I've seen. His series on global warming is a must see, if you haven't seen it already.
Anyway, I can only imagine what goes on inside the creationist mind when it reflects on this.
Sure, there's variation within kinds. That's not evolution, that's micro-evolution - a totally different thing. 😏
Yes, ...[text shortened]... , that's easy, a five-year old can do it: anything that's not a banana. 😏
😕
Wait! No! 😲
25 Mar 15
Originally posted by C HessPotholer needs to take a course in logic because his logic is terrible. Potholer claims whales had feet. This is obviously not true, but it does not keep evolutionists from claiming this ridiculous idea just like they claim fish gained feet and crawled out on land and began breathing oxygen from air instead of water because their gills turned into lungs at the same time. This is just more evolution crap.
Well, apparently he did several years ago, but I missed it.
Potholer and Hovind Come Together (Not like that!): https://youtu.be/l-ilMYc5xdQ
😲
26 Mar 15
Originally posted by OdBodThis is simply Potholer presenting a bad example to misrepresent Hovind's point in producing an illogical conclusion. Just because a gorilla, an oragutan, and a man all eats a banana does not mean that all but the banana are the same kind as evolutionists like Potholer seem to think. 😏
I loved the suggestion that the Banana, Gorilla, Orangutan , Man experiment be put to a young creationist.
26 Mar 15
Originally posted by RJHindsAs if anyone believes a fish with lungs!!
this ridiculous idea just like they claim fish gained feet and crawled out on land and began breathing oxygen from air instead of water because their gills turned into lungs at the same time.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bichir
26 Mar 15
Originally posted by RJHindsDon't be mad at potholer. It is Hovind who says that two groups of non-interbreeding animals are still the same kind if they share common ancestry, and that common ancestry is determined by what isn't a banana.
Potholer needs to take a course in logic because his logic is terrible. Potholer claims whales had feet. This is obviously not true, but it does not keep evolutionists from claiming this ridiculous idea just like they claim fish gained feet and crawled out on land and began breathing oxygen from air instead of water because their gills turned into lungs at the same time. This is just more evolution crap.
Incidently, there's a good fossil record demonstrating that whale ancestors (not modern whales, nor bananas) had legs. If you want to close your eyes, cover your ears and sing la-la-la, that's fine, but it doesn't change the fossil record, I'm glad to say.
And no, gills never turned into lungs. Lungs evolved into the swimbladder in modern fish.
Your post is just more creationist crap.
Originally posted by RJHindsWay to miss the point there.
This is simply Potholer presenting a bad example to misrepresent Hovind's point in producing an illogical conclusion. Just because a gorilla, an oragutan, and a man all eats a banana does not mean that all but the banana are the same kind as evolutionists like Potholer seem to think. 😏
Originally posted by RBHILLTrue, but since there is no bible god (which is not to say it is impossible for there to be some kind of god out there) the whole thing is just another of the myriad of scams invented by those clever humans.
If one thing is wrong with God's word then you can't trust the Bible and he idiot!!!
You know there is something fishy going on when the Miss Universe contest happens and someone from Earth wins EVERY TIME! It's a conspiracy I tell ya, a VAST atheistic conspiracy!
Originally posted by sonhouseHow about this if you think that the Bible is written by flawed man how can you trust any other books ever written? Or even any other idea?
True, but since there is no bible god (which is not to say it is impossible for there to be some kind of god out there) the whole thing is just another of the myriad of scams invented by those clever humans.
You know there is something fishy going on when the Miss Universe contest happens and someone from Earth wins EVERY TIME! It's a conspiracy I tell ya, a VAST atheistic conspiracy!
Why are there millions of diet books? Why haven't they figured it out? One book is all you needed why have the other 999,999 health books?