1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75LOL!!!!!
No it's clear by your insulting attitude and arrogance you don't get it and never will until you find some level of humility. As long as that's who you are God will never let you understand.
Mark 7:20-22
Common English Bible (CEB)
20 “It’s what comes out of a person that contaminates someone in God’s sight,” he said. 21 “It’s from the inside, from says, “GOD IS OPPOSED TO THE """"PROUD"""" BUT GIVES GRACE TO THE HUMBLE.”
That coming from you is hilarious. Goodness grief, what a plonker.
The scientist that don't believe in the Holy Bible say that the
flood evidence all over the world were a series of localized floods
and not one hugh flood like in the Holy Bible. They think the
different stories told about a large flood from traditions of the
various peoples in different places is evidence that it was not
just one hugh flood that covered the whole earth. But they can't
deny that the whole earth was flooded. They just argue that it
is not the biblical flood. So there you have it, in a nutshell.
Originally posted by RJHindsThis is the nutshell - There was no global flood.
The scientist that don't believe in the Holy Bible say that the
flood evidence all over the world were a series of localized floods
and not one hugh flood like in the Holy Bible. They think the
different stories told about a large flood from traditions of the
various peoples in different places is evidence that it was not
just one hugh flood that cover ...[text shortened]... ed. They just argue that it
is not the biblical flood. So there you have it, in a nutshell.
There are scientists who 'believe in the Holy Bible' who accept there was no global flood. It's a nice black and white picture you're trying to paint there, but it's not quite right.
Originally posted by Proper KnobDr. John Baumgardner, Ph. D Geophysics/Space Physics says
This is the nutshell - There was no global flood.
There are scientists who 'believe in the Holy Bible' who accept there was no global flood. It's a nice black and white picture you're trying to paint there, but it's not quite right.
there is a large amount of evidence for a global flood.
From his website: http://www.globalflood.org/
My conclusion is that the Flood was one facet of a larger global-scale tectonic cataclysm. A key aspect of this catastrophe was the rapid sinking, in conveyor belt fashion, of the pre-Flood ocean tectonic plates into the earth's interior. The energy required for the process was derived from the earth's gravity acting on the excess weight of these cold ocean plates relative to the hotter and less dense mantle rock into which they slid. Decades of laboratory experiments attest to the fact that, under stress, mantle rock, at temperatures estimated for the earth's interior, can weaken by factors of billions or more. My work on this problem has primarily involved computer experiments that apply the properties of silicate rock, as measured in these laboratory experiments, to the setting of the earth's mantle. These calculations demonstrate that a catastrophic instability can indeed occur in a planet with the size and structure of the earth. This mechanism for the Flood cataclysm has become known as catastrophic plate tectonics. My latest modeling results are described in a paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Creationism in August 2003.
The purpose of this website is to collect into one place
(1) a selection of the massive evidence that supports the reality of the Biblical Flood,
(2) a clear description of a tectonic mechanism for this cataclysm as well as current modeling results, and
(3) a collection of related materials that provide some of the context of the broader debate in which the issue of the Flood is only one facet.
It is true that evolutionists generally feel secure today, even in the face of compelling creationist arguments, because of their utter confidence in the geological time scale. Even if they cannot provide a naturalistic mechanism for macroevolution, they appeal to the 'fact of evolution,' by which they mean an interpretation of earth history in which they believe there has been a succession of different types of plants and animals in a drama spanning many hundreds of millions of years. The Bible, by contrast, paints a radically different picture of our planet's history. In particular, it describes a point in time when God catastrophically destroyed the earth with essentially all its life. The only consistent way to interpret the geological record in light of this event described so vividly in the Biblical texts is to understand that the fossil-bearing rocks are the result of a massive global cataclysm that occurred only a few thousand years ago and lasted but a year. This Biblical interpretation of the rock record implies the animals and plants preserved as fossils were all contemporaries, all living on earth at the same time prior to the cataclysm. This means trilobites, dinosaurs, and mammals all dwelled on the planet at once, and they all perished together in this world-destroying cataclysm. Since the time scale is such a key issue in the interpretation of the geological record, this site also gives considerable emphasis to compelling new radioisotope evidence for the planet's young age.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat exactly does this prove?
Dr. John Baumgardner, Ph. D Geophysics/Space Physics says
there is a large amount of evidence for a global flood.
From his website: http://www.globalflood.org/
My conclusion is that the Flood was one facet of a larger global-scale tectonic cataclysm. A key aspect of this catastrophe was the rapid sinking, in conveyor belt fashion, of the pre-Flood oce ...[text shortened]... onsiderable emphasis to compelling new radioisotope evidence for the planet's young age.
Originally posted by RJHindsHere are some Christian scientists who accept the earth is 4.5 billion years old and that the flood wasn't global.
It proves that this scientist believes in the global flood
mentioned in the Holy Bible. He has even done experiments
to prove it. He also has proof the earth is not 4.5 billion year
old.
http://www.reasons.org/testing-flood-geology
Originally posted by RJHindsIt wasn't plate tectonics, it was global warming which caused the icecaps to melt.
Dr. John Baumgardner, Ph. D Geophysics/Space Physics says
there is a large amount of evidence for a global flood.
From his website: http://www.globalflood.org/
My conclusion is that the Flood was one facet of a larger global-scale tectonic cataclysm. A key aspect of this catastrophe was the rapid sinking, in conveyor belt fashion, of the pre-Flood oce ...[text shortened]... onsiderable emphasis to compelling new radioisotope evidence for the planet's young age.