Originally posted by twhitehead
Actually it is much simpler than that. I won't bother because I know that you yourself do not understand the so called 'evidence' and if I explained it all to you, you would admit that it is not sufficient (or outright wrong) but it would not change your views anyway - or, more likely in your case, you would pretend to be stupid and just keep on repeating ...[text shortened]... the expert because you know you cannot answer my question without admitting you are wrong.
See what I mean, he ignores the majority samples and concentrates
on the one doubtful sample that conforms to his world view. Then
he accuses me of ignoring this one sample, as if it were more
important than the others. Even the scientist himself ignored it
as being unimportant to his finding because of the doubtful dating.
Why then don't you ask the expert, that I gave you the link to, if
you think I am wrong? I believe you don't want to know the truth.