1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs I said to you, no one knows how life started, it remains an unknown process. How can statistics be produced for an unknown process?
sure i was, still waiting for you to produce your own statistics.
As for your lies, I quite categorically showed that no one 'evolutionist' acknowledges the numbers you produced. It's creationist junk.
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper Knobyou were asked to produce a figure for what you might think could be mathematically so improbable as to be almost impossible, so far you have produced nada, if you dont think that evolutionists make the claim, then here is your chance to put it right. No amount of caustic diatribe can make up for lack of content. Where are your statistics?
As I said to you, no one knows how life started, it remains an unknown process. How can statistics be produced for an unknown process?
As for your lies, I quite categorically showed that no one 'evolutionist' acknowledges the numbers you produced. It's creationist junk.
3 edits
Originally posted by robbie carrobieStatistics for what exactly? Why do I need to produce these statistics? What do they prove?
you were asked to produce a figure for what you might think could be mathematically so improbable as to be almost impossible, so far you have produced nada, if you dont think that evolutionists make the claim, then here is your chance to put it right. No amount of caustic diatribe can make up for lack of content. Where are your statistics?
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper Knobsigh, you state that evolutionists dont hold that a number can be so improbable as to be mathematically almost impossible, well here is your chance to put that right. Do you think that an event happening or not happening with a chance of 1x10^50 is probable or improbable?
Statistics for what exactly? Why do I need to produce these statistics? What do they prove?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhere have I stated that evolutionists don't hold that a number can be so improbable as to be mathematically almost impossible?
sigh, you state that evolutionists dont hold that a number can be so improbable as to be mathematically almost impossible, well here is your chance to put that right. Do you think that an event happening with a chance in 1x10^50 is probable or improbable?
Originally posted by Proper KnobBible doesn't say, it merely states that God created.
You don't have to, but I have been quite clear and precise. That you have failed to follow the thread, again, is hardly surprising.
If life can't have arisen by naturalistic means in your eyes, can you explain how God did do it?
Originally posted by robbie carrobieFractals are fascinating things and, as it happens, one of the big bits of evidence that very complex things can be generated from very simple rules without recourse to gods, demons, angels, fairies, imps, pixies, dragons or any other supernatural jiggery pokery.
Do you like fractals? I love them. It seems to me that much of the universe is fractal. Variations on a theme.
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobTry a book by Hugh Ross astrophysicist "More Than Theory". Or his book "Treasures in the Book of Job" is similar.
The Bible doesn't have to be a 'detailed scientific text book', how hard would it have been for the Biblical God to have added a few more details into the creation account?
Some interesting science / Bible matters there.
RJHinds will not recommend it probably because many YEC organizations oppose Ross's group Reasons to Believe which is OEC.
Some things recommended in the book or at his site does not mean I agree with everything he has written.