Originally posted by eatmybishop
the big bang theory is not fact scherzo.... hence the word "theory"....
here's a few questions for you....
1, how could the universe - which has way too much large scale structure - form in a time as short as 10-20 billion years?
2, do you agree with a large number of scientists who state that predictions using the big bang theory require too m ...[text shortened]... niverse)
i have lots more but i let you ponder on them... look forward to your answers...
A whole thread?!? For me
Answering questions one by one.
1. Through the Big Bang. The original explosion spread huge amounts of matter in an extremely short time. Then it started slowing down as energy became transferred into light, heat, etc. Just like any explosion.
2. No, I disagree. These scientists overlook the fact that we're dealing with a very new vacuum, where the laws are much more constant. They are most likely just scared to prove the theory.
3. Actually not aware of these. Maybe I'm too ill-informed to answer it, but if you're trying to prove Creationism to be correct (else this would be in the science forum), you only hurt your case.
4. Neil deGrasse Tyson doesn't. And he's the leading American astrophysicist. Why should I agree?
5. Again, see answer to #1.