Originally posted by nook7 So the people who write it - decide that their version is bonafide and then all is ok.
This sounds identical to those who claim the bible is absolute and perfect.
You see the posts of ardent christians on this site - they make the same claims as you do Vishie - that their book is perfect - why are they wrong? You know that neither of you has proof of any ...[text shortened]... ant you admit that this is all belief and stop spouting the drivel about people being dishonest.
The Vedic teachings support themselves because they have abundant true knowledge, and the Bible mocks itself because it presents error.
So if you take the time to compare yourself (at least a few yrs) you will see the vast difference in what is presented.
One presents error and the other presents perfect truth..
Originally posted by vishvahetu You will have to study the bonafide teachings of the Vedanta Sutra, Srimad Bhagavatam and Bhagavad Gita and others, and then you will have to seek guidance from someone who is devoted to the spiritual process to help you in your understanding, and then you would have to live the spiritual life yourself, for many many years, and in this way you will come t ...[text shortened]... I know what I know to you, because it has taken 40 yrs of spiritual living to know what I know.
but you will never know trith if you remain dishonest and insincere.
Ad hominem attacks are worthless arguments. Do you want a discussion with valid arguments or do you prefer to continue preaching and scolding?
Originally posted by vishvahetu Yes I do, and it also fabricated and false.
The original bonafide religion for mankind is the Vedic teachings, which were existing long before the other substitute religions were fabricated by bewildered dishonest men.
The resurrection of Jesus is not a lie.
If you say it is a lie, then you are believing a lie.
Originally posted by vishvahetu You have no valid arguments because you only quote from an unauthorized fabricated Bible, and you have thrown common sense away
you only quote from an unauthorized fabricated Bible
You err again. I didn't quote the Bible. I don't believe it is Gods word. I am not a Bible believer (although I love the story). Neither am I a Veda-believer (although I love the stories).
I don't care if people believe in Bible or Vedas. I appreciate to hear and test their arguments. But I dislike it when they start scolding opponents because they don't share their opinions, as you constantly do.
Originally posted by souverein you only quote from an unauthorized fabricated Bible
You err again. I didn't quote the Bible. I don't believe it is Gods word. I am not a Bible believer (although I love the story). Neither am I a Veda-believer (although I love the stories).
I don't care if people believe in Bible or Vedas. I appreciate to hear and test their arguments. But I d ...[text shortened]... they start scolding opponents because they don't share their opinions, as you constantly do.
Yes I scold persons who say that animal cruelty is acceptable.
I scold people who say that the cosmos has no intelligent directive.
Yes I scold people who falsely teach that persons will go to hell.
Originally posted by vishvahetu You have no valid arguments because you only quote from an unauthorized fabricated Bible, and you have thrown common sense away
I have yet to see you quote from the authorized Tao De Ching. Your comments are void of Tao.
Originally posted by expuddlepirate Hitler's soul is now living in a ring worm in Cleveland Ohio. Dahmer is still working his way up the food chain to an Injury Attorney in Mongolia.
Originally posted by souverein Scolding people on a forum because they hold opinions you detest is against the rules.
It is like playing chess with two kings.
You know that what they are presenting is foolishness and absurd,......why defend it.
Why dont you also take the side of truth and correct teachings, and not false teachings.
You cannot say their false teachings are not false.
If you are honest you cannot support them with conviction.