Forum etiquette #2

Originally posted by sonship
Backpeddling now when you make an issue of someone's "worst behavior" is slimy to say the least.

"Worst" implies rating genius.

Not back pedaling at all. You simply didn't bother to read my original post and instead read josephw's take on it and totally missed the context of the word 'worst'.

-Removed-

Ok, I get it. No quarter.

In that case, you are just 100% wrong.

Originally posted by FMF
You have completely sidestepped the content and meaning of my response to you. What I said was, in effect, an observation on the way you make use of this message board. But you choose to ignore it.

Because it's untrue, simple as that.

Originally posted by josephw
You're just saying that because no one is paying any attention to you.

Joking.

From now on I'm going to write the word "joking" when I'm joking.

If you expect your jokes to be recognized as such, don't write 'joking' when what you're saying is absolutely true.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Because it's untrue, simple as that.

So you are claiming it is "untrue" to say that sonship uses this debating board to "preach" using long long long copy pasted quotes from texts, endless monologues based closely on the writings of some ideologues he admires, and sometimes makes seven or eight or more posts in a row containing doctrine and dogma, and that he does this day after day while showing little or no interest in beliefs that are different from his?

You are claiming all that is "untrue" about sonship?

Originally posted by FMF
So you are claiming it is "untrue" to say that sonship uses this debating board to "preach" using long long long copy pasted quotes from texts, endless monologues based closely on the writings of some ideologues he admires, and sometimes makes seven or eight or more posts in a row containing doctrine and dogma, and that he does this day after day while showing l ...[text shortened]... in beliefs that are different from his?

You are claiming all that is "untrue" about sonship?

It becomes tiring in the extreme to talk to you anymore, since you continually grab the wrong end of the stick. Learn a new trick or two.

Originally posted by Suzianne
It becomes tiring in the extreme to talk to you anymore, since you continually grab the wrong end of the stick. Learn a new trick or two.

I know and he alluded to me as tedious when I am more light and breezy for sure- classic FML gaffe.

-Removed-

No, that's not right.

I've had my disagreements with him and we talked it out and I find that I have more in common with his ideas than I have disagreement. Running over the same old ground ad nauseum doesn't help anybody. The differences we do have are minor points of doctrine, certainly not enough to cause salvation to be lost, unlike the differences I have with others in this forum. Even you and I have more in agreement than disagreement. Where you and I butt heads most often is your treatment of other Christians in this forum.

And that's really all there is to that.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I know and he alluded to me as tedious when I am more light and breezy for sure- classic FML gaffe.

Dude, you are so "light and breezy" as to be practically insubstantial, to be sure.

Originally posted by Suzianne
Dude, you are so "light and breezy" as to be practically insubstantial, to be sure.

why thank you mam. (said with a southern accent)

Originally posted by Suzianne
It becomes tiring in the extreme to talk to you anymore, since you continually grab the wrong end of the stick. Learn a new trick or two.

You always say cliched things like this when you have blurted out something that's economical with the truth.

Originally posted by Suzianne
The differences [sonship and I] do have are minor points of doctrine...

The supposed "perfect morality" of angry, vengeful, eternal torture of billions and billions of humans for not being Christians is a "minor point of doctrine"?

Originally posted by FMF
You always say cliched things like this when you have blurted out something that's economical with the truth.

"economical"

That IS one way to put it. The one way that is downright stingy with the truth.

My point is that almost everything you say lends towards a user-car salesman desperate to make a sale of a rather tawdry vehicle. And I really can't be the only one who sees it. Telling you to "learn a new trick or two" is some rather good, undeserved, and probably unappreciated advice. Your predictability rather bores me to tears most days.