2 edits
Originally posted by SuzianneWell this is exactly the right thread for you to say this kind of thing on. What a pity you say things just like this on so very many other threads too where there are discussions about other things going on ~ conversation after conversation 'adorned' with these sorts of off-topic personal comments over and over and over again ~ but... it's on topic here, so I commend you.
My point is that almost everything you say lends towards a user-car salesman desperate to make a sale of a rather tawdry vehicle. And I really can't be the only one who sees it. Telling you to "learn a new trick or two" is some rather good, undeserved, and probably unappreciated advice. Your predictability rather bores me to tears most days.
Originally posted by FMFAnd here is a point you have in common with divegeester.
The supposed "perfect morality" of angry, vengeful, eternal torture of billions and billions of humans for not being Christians is a "minor point of doctrine"?
You can attack people and render them as somehow even "less than human" in your own mind, and that seems okay to you, but when someone calls your own "precious" pet peeves as something, yes, completely minor in the greater panoply of God's perfect justice and grace, you lose all focus and act the perfect, taken-aback "wronged" victim, all because someone actually has the "temerity" to disagree with you and your own self-importance.
2 edits
Originally posted by SuzianneIf the eternal torture of billions and billions of humans for not being Christians is an example of the "perfect morality" of the god figure sonship promotes ~ if it is a merely a "minor point of doctrine" to you, then the notion and identity and character of the god figure you promote here is incoherent.
You can attack people and render them as somehow even "less than human" in your own mind, and that seems okay to you, but when someone calls your own "precious" pet peeves as something, yes, completely minor in the greater panoply of God's perfect justice and grace, you lose all focus and act the perfect, taken-aback "wronged" victim, all because someone actually has the "temerity" to disagree with you and your own self-importance.
Originally posted by FMF[snark] Oh, goodie... I was worried there for a moment. [/snark]
Well this is exactly the right thread for you to say this kind of thing on. What a pity you say things just like this on so very many other threads too where there are discussions about other things going on ~ conversation after conversation 'adorned' with these sorts of off-topic personal comments over and over and over again ~ but... it's on topic here, so I commend you.
God forbid you actually bother to meet the charge head on. You haven't yet -- perhaps that's why I keep bringing it up. You often go on and on and on and on and on [ad infinitum] to others not responding to your loaded questions, and yet you yourself exhibit astounding deafness at the most opportune times.
Originally posted by SuzianneIf you decide to keep these kinds personal remarks to threads like this, then it's fine by me.
God forbid you actually bother to meet the charge head on. You haven't yet -- perhaps that's why I keep bringing it up. You often go on and on and on and on and on [ad infinitum] to others not responding to your loaded questions, and yet you yourself exhibit astounding deafness at the most opportune times.
Originally posted by FMFAccording to you.
If the eternal torture of billions and billions of humans for not being Christians is an example of the "perfect morality" of the god figure sonship promotes ~ if it is a merely a "minor point of doctrine" to you, then the notion and identity and character of the god figure you promote here is incoherent.
And, as I've been saying, your judgement and value-assigning mechanics are rather short-circuited. That you happen to share these defects with others in this forum comes absolutely as no surprise.
It's rather difficult to get a blind man to appreciate the value of colors. Yea, even that they exist at all.
Originally posted by SuzianneSaying things like this to me does not reconcile the nature of sonship's god figure with the nature of your god figure.
And, as I've been saying, your judgement and value-assigning mechanics are rather short-circuited. That you happen to share these defects with others in this forum comes absolutely as no surprise.
Originally posted by FMFOkay, now you're boring me.
Earlier you said I "attack people and render them as somehow even less than human". Can you cite a thread where you believe this is what I did?
This is your classic FMF "first line of defense". It works because no one wants to confront such a tedious and petty prosecution line that is way more work than it's worth. I told you once that I am not wading through your old posts, that they were awful enough the first time, and I mean it.
"Learn a new trick or two." Please.
Originally posted by SuzianneSo I supposedly "attack people and render them as somehow even less than human" but you cannot give even just one example of a conversation where you reckon this happened?
This is your classic FMF "first line of defense". It works because no one wants to confront such a tedious and petty prosecution line that is way more work than it's worth. I told you once that I am not wading through your old posts, that they were awful enough the first time, and I mean it.
Originally posted by SuzianneBut if I attacked people as if they were "less than human" or talked to them is if "they murdered [my] children", surely you can remember which threads these things happened on?
I told you once that I am not wading through your old posts, that they were awful enough the first time, and I mean it.