Forum etiquette

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
Forward them to me, divegeester. And I'll then tell galveston75 whether he needs to retract his accusation or not.

You have no legal or moral right to any private messages except those which were directly sent to you by an originator and if your partner in crime, divesgeester meow meow insists on forwarding them, then he is morally corrupt for doing so. They are termed private messages for a reason.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
if Robbie and the Gman are like batman and Robin then bitchingeester must be.... the Catwoman??? all that meowing he does. Indeed sometimes I simply cannot be bothered replying as i got mega other stuff to do, no one is under any compulsion to say anything, next we shall be receiving subpoenas and divesgeester will be pacing up and down shining ligh ...[text shortened]... ester as Rosco Peeko and Bourbaki as Boss Hogg. Some people simply take themselves too serious.

beauroberts I presume is Batgirl?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you have no legal or moral right to any private messages and if your partner in crime insists on forwarding them he too is morally corrupt for doing so. They are termed private messages for a reason.

Divegeester can of course show me whatever messages he sent to galveston75 if he wants to. I have "no legal or moral right" to force divegeester to do so. But he can just show me if he wants.

I think divesgeester should give galveston75 permission to publish these supposedly "trolling" PMs.

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
Divegeester can of course show me whatever messages he sent to galveston75 if he wants to. I have "no legal or moral right" to force divegeester to do so. But he can just show me if he wants.

I think divesgeester should give galveston75 permission to publish these supposedly "trolling" PMs.

yes if he is the originator of the text but he cannot show you any private correspondence that he has received from the Gman which means that your ability to judge, if you had any authority at the outset other than your self appointment is severely impaired, for you know only half of what was said.

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
I think divesgeester should give galveston75 permission to publish these supposedly "trolling" PMs.

divesgeester: He has my permission.

OK. I see divesgeester now has.

So galveston75 can show these PMs supposedly "trolling" him about health problems in his family.

-Removed-

dude i don't even tread your texts that much, as i have said numerous times, I don't find what you have to say that interesting, sorry.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
yes if he is the originator of the text but he cannot show you any private correspondence that he has received from the Gman which means that your ability to judge, if you had any authority at the outset other than your self appointment is severely impaired, for you know only half of what was said.

We are talking about divesgeester telling us what he wrote in his PMs and whether galveston75 is telling the truth about their content.

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
OK. I see divesgeester now has.

So galveston75 can show these PMs supposedly "trolling" him about health problems in his family.

is it good forum etiquette to reveal the details of private messages which are none of your business other than that you have made it your affair? i don't think so and yet here you are fomenting just that, ouch that gotta hurt. Is it not good etiquette to mind ones own business?

-Removed-

Beauroberts spoke about it in public on the "Praying Through Jesus not To Jesus" thread.

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
We are talking about divesgeester telling us what he wrote in his PMs and whether galveston75 is telling the truth about their content.

are you, perhaps i should read his texts more, either way, you are still concerning yourself with what is none of your business. Infact I would like to know how it came to be your business?