Go back
Forum etiquette

Forum etiquette

Spirituality

1 edit

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
is it good forum etiquette to reveal the details of private messages which are none of your business other than that you have made it your affair? i don't think so and yet here you are fomenting just that, ouch that gotta hurt. ?
galveston75 has made the accusation that the PM's were divegeester "trolling"him on health issues. If that turns out to be untrue than I think the issue of "good forum etiquette" is going to have galveston75 in a spotlight, not divegeester.

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
my underwear is not in a twist, frankly i don't care what you say, as i said what you write is not that interesting and I rarely read it with any focus, you simply cannot handle being ignored and when you are you need to bitch about it to others, thus this thread, classic troll behavior, you don't get fed and you start howling.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Infact I would like to know how it came to be your business?
It has become everyone and anyone's business now galveston75 has made the accusation in public.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
my underwear is not in a twist, frankly i don't care what you say, as i said what you write is not that interesting and I rarely read it with any focus, you simply cannot handle being ignored and when you are you need to bitch about it to others, thus this thread, classic troll behavior, you don't get fed and you start howling.
galveston75 has divegeester's permission to publish the PMs.You should urge galveston75 to do so and substantiate his accusations.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
galveston75 has made the accusation that the PM's were divegeester "trolling"him on health issues. If that turns out to be untrue than I think the issue of "good forum etiquette" is going to have galveston75 in a spotlight, not divegeester.
what galveston on any one else has said concerning private correspondence is none of your business. If glaveston feels that divesgeester is a troll then its your concern how? If he had called you a troll then you may have recourse to extract an apology but he has not and its none of your concern, is it.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
galveston75 has divegeester's permission to publish the PMs.You should urge galveston75 to do so and substantiate his accusations.
I should do nothing of the sort, what passes between others in private correspondence is none of my concern, not yours, man you are like a bunch of old gossiping housewives, divesgeester bitchin cause he cannot troll when he gets ignored, you wanting to know the juice, give me a break, i got better things to do than this jive.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what galveston on any one else has said concerning private correspondence is none of your business. If glaveston feels that divesgeester is a troll then its your concern how? If he had called you a troll then you may have recourse to extract an aplogy but he has not and its none of your concern, is it.
The accusation has been made in the public forum and divegeester has consented to the PMs in question to be read by anyone who wants to read them.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I should do nothing of the sort, what passes between others in private correspondence is none of my concern, not yours...
galveston75 has made claims ~ in public ~ about what was in this "private correspondence". He can now substantiate these claims if he chooses to.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
The accusation has been made in the public forum and divegeester has consented to the PMs in question to be read by anyone who wants to read them.
wow you seriously don't have anything better to do than this.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
wow you seriously don't have anything better to do than this.
If galveston75 has told the truth in this matter, don't you want it to be established as being the truth?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
galveston75 has made claims ~ in public ~ about what was in this "private correspondence". He can now substantiate these claims if he chooses to.
or he can choose to get a life and do something interesting

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nick Bourbaki
If galveston75 has told the truth in this matter, don't you want it to be established as being the truth?
I don't care

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
wow you seriously don't have anything better to do than this.
I'm listening to West Ham v Man Utd on the radio as I type.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.