God's Kingdom-Real?

Originally posted by sonship

Do these qualities describe something in a person's heart or a real government?

The question as it is framed really sets up a false dichotomy.
IE. "real government" verses "something in a person's heart."

The kingdom of the heavens in the book of [b]Matthew is firstly inward in the disciples. It is even hidden yet real. Even ...[text shortened]... of the kingdom of God - its critical inward reality and the reward of its outward manifestation.[/b]

The kingdom of the heavens in the book of Matthew is firstly inward in the disciples - jaywill

Nonsense and unsupported by the original language or the context.

(please dont post a wall of text attempting to substantiate your claim.)

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
The kingdom of the heavens in the book of Matthew is firstly inward in the disciples - jaywill

Nonsense and unsupported by the original language or the context.

(please dont post a wall of text attempting to substantiate your claim.)

Would you like a Youtube video instead?

Here is a short one:

The Kingdom of Heaven

YouTube

Originally posted by sonship
IE. "real government" verses "something in a person's heart."

versus .... for god's sake man!

Originally posted by wolfgang59
versus .... for god's sake man!

Can't you see it as simply a typing error .... for god's sake man! 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Would you like a Youtube video instead?

Here is a short one:

The Kingdom of Heaven

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y3xzBZNM3L0

I never watch any of your YouTube videos Jonah. If you can explain in simple terms how the verse at Matthew supports the position (that the Kingdom of God is within) both linguistically and contextually then please do so.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I never watch any of your YouTube videos Jonah. If you can explain in simple terms how the verse at Matthew supports the position (that the Kingdom of God is within) both linguistically and contextually then please do so.

How man times does sonhouse have to point out that RJHinds can not think for himself, but needs BS youtube videos to do it for him?

Originally posted by RJHinds
How man times does sonhouse have to point out that RJHinds can not think for himself, but needs BS youtube videos to do it for him?

Sorry I was unaware that you had come to this realisation. What do you plan to do about it?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Sorry I was unaware that you had come to this realisation. What do you plan to do about it?

Oh my god, i gave Robbie a thumbs up.

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Oh my god, i gave Robbie a thumbs up.

Me too!

There must be a disturbance in the Force...

Originally posted by divegeester
Me too!

There must be a disturbance in the Force...

In the realm of Star Wars though, i think he is less Luke Skywalker and more Jabba the Hutt.

😲

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
Oh my god, i gave Robbie a thumbs up.

this is typical, all by brilliant and original posts get ignored or thumbed down and all my rubbish ones resonate with some people, there is NO justice.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
this is typical, all by brilliant and original posts get ignored or thumbed down and all my rubbish ones resonate with some people, there is NO justice.

I promise that the day you post something brilliant i will give it a thumbs up.

It's at times like these that I'm glad I peaked into a thread that seemed to hold nothing of interest to me. 😵

Originally posted by Rajk999
Your question has no relevance to the topic.
If you can, address the issue in the topic you started.

My question does relate to your uncalled for accusation against JW's.
It would be good to know your viewpoint in making that accusation.
It would also be good if you could contribute any constructive thoughts to the subject of God's Kingdom being real or not.

Originally posted by divegeester
No, there is no "direction". There is only forum etiquette and intellectual honesty, both of which you are sadly lacking. The words you posted in YOUR opening post, which is not a reply/quote of another post in the same thread, are SOME ELSE'S words which you are trying to pass off as your own. Your JW buddy Galveston75 was repeatedly called out over the same issue.

So your spewing ad hominum attacks is considered good etiquette?
Do you have any thoughts about God's Kingdom being real?