Originally posted by sonship
Stephen Hawking Discussed by scientist John Lennox and apologist Ravi Zacharias.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0wMyMmjPgLs Part 1
Dr John Lennox and Dr Ravi Zacharias are two men in agreement that make sense to me in this crazy world of atheists attempting to promote scientism as the answer to everything. I watched all three parts of the video and especially liked how Dr Zacharias points out the fact that the non-physical aspects of our existence can't just arise from physical laws. Here is a link to that part:
YouTube
I would have preferred this to be one long continuous video than having a repeat of the same talk that ended the first part staring all over again on the beginning of the second part of the video. But perhaps it was repeated to emphasize what Dr Lennox said about the self-cntradictory aspect at 3 levels of the claim of Stephen Hawking that the law of gravity will cause the universe to create itself from nothing.
These two agree that Stephen Hawking has presented no new idea, but only states it in a way that may help in the marketing of his book, because of the ideology it expresses in the war of the two worldviews. Those worldviews being scientism and theology.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientism
It is pointed out that Hawking states that his ideas are based on scientific determinism and that free-will is an illusion. But is this really science? It seems to be presented as such, instead of an ideology, see the link.
http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/scientific%20determinism
Dr Zacharias at the end of the third part suggests that Stephen Hawking being allowed to exist by being born instead of being aborted may have been to show the power of God. This reminds me of the question asked to Jesus as to the reason a certain blind man was born blind. I wonder if Hawkins has an explantion for the idea of good and evil and our personality, if there is no personal Creator as he claims.