12 Jul '06 22:18>
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundNow that's what I call an empirical hypothesis.
so the all might deity answers to the name you give him?
Lets call him shep for a while, and see if he brings a stick.
Originally posted by PawnokeyholeHow coincidental. This is from an artical about Taoist Philosophy i put in my private forum only a couple of days ago. . .i think it is apt.
Now that's what I call an empirical hypothesis.
Originally posted by MixoEveryone knows he died a long time ago. The Romans got him.
In Old Testament days God interacted very publically with humans. In the New Testament there are a few public displays. In the Book of the Apocalypse he promises a big finale VERY SOON, while the Babylonian empire is still all-powerful.
Then,,,, nothing. Admit it folks. God achieved what only a god could. And then he died. :'(
His creation lives on and we worship his memory so don't cry. Enjoy what he has left us but don't bank on an afterlife.😏
Originally posted by huckleberryhoundThe Tao that can be Taoed is not the true Tao.
How coincidental. This is from an artical about Taoist Philosophy i put in my private forum only a couple of days ago. . .i think it is apt.
The essential principal has no name, so he tentatively called it Tao, although he realised that naming it was not only inadequate but certrain restrictions were also immediately introduced. Here he came up ...[text shortened]... ries the inherent idea of "many"; as does the term "ten thousand" when used to describe Tao.