Go back
He Was There

He Was There

Spirituality

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
29 Jan 20

John was there and he said "I saw" 36 times in the book of Revelation.

John literally saw things that are real, that will literally happen. John saw literal people, angels, places and a host of literally real things.

John was there, but you weren't.

Ghost of a Duke

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
29602
Clock
29 Jan 20

@secondson said
John was there and he said "I saw" 36 times in the book of Revelation.

John literally saw things that are real, that will literally happen. John saw literal people, angels, places and a host of literally real things.

John was there, but you weren't.
Please provide evidence that he was there (outside of him saying he was).

Please also provide evidence that he saw what he said he saw.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
29 Jan 20
1 edit

@secondson said
John was there and he said "I saw" 36 times in the book of Revelation.

John literally saw things that are real, that will literally happen. John saw literal people, angels, places and a host of literally real things.

John was there, but you weren't.
Good grief; I get so tired of this literalist nonsense by American Christians.

BigDogg
Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
Clock
30 Jan 20

@secondson said
John was there and he said "I saw" 36 times in the book of Revelation.

John literally saw things that are real, that will literally happen. John saw literal people, angels, places and a host of literally real things.

John was there, but you weren't.
Oh well.

I've been a lot of places that he never got to see, so I guess it evens out.

Suzianne
Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
37388
Clock
30 Jan 20

@divegeester said
Good grief; I get so tired of this literalist nonsense by American Christians.
Is your God a literal God, or a hypothetical God?

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
30 Jan 20
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@suzianne said
Is your God a literal God, or a hypothetical God?
Literal.

Your turn...

Do you believe that the multiheaded beast being ridden by the whore, and as was “seen” by John, is literal?

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
30 Jan 20

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Please provide evidence that he was there (outside of him saying he was).

Please also provide evidence that he saw what he said he saw.
That's silly. Provide evidence to the contrary.

John was eye witness to the ministry of Jesus Christ. Saw Jesus die on the cross, and saw Him alive again afterwards, along with hundreds of others.

So without evidence that you will accept John is just lying?

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
30 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@bigdoggproblem said
Oh well.

I've been a lot of places that he never got to see, so I guess it evens out.
That's an irrelevant point.

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
30 Jan 20

@divegeester said
Good grief; I get so tired of this literalist nonsense by American Christians.
And I get tired of wishy-washy claim to be Christians that say Revelation is all metaphorical, but offer nothing about what it means.

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
30 Jan 20

@divegeester said
Literal.

Your turn...

Do you believe that the multiheaded beast being ridden by the whore, and as was “seen” by John, is literal?
Your argument is without merit because everyone knows it's symbolic, but of what is the question.

The "multiheaded beast" is symbolic of something literal and real, and that's where you hit the wall. So, since you can't understand it, you become demeaning towards others.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
30 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
Your argument is without merit because everyone knows it's symbolic, but of what is the question.

The "multiheaded beast" is symbolic of something literal and real, and that's where you hit the wall. So, since you can't understand it, you become demeaning towards others.
So your OP claiming that John saw literal things is actually saying he saw symbolic things?

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
30 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
And I get tired of wishy-washy claim to be Christians that say Revelation is all metaphorical, but offer nothing about what it means.
The onus is not on me to state what all the symbolism means, but I know that multiheaded beasts and cavernous hell-holes were billions of non Christians will be burnt alive by Jesus is not literal.

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
30 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester said
So your OP claiming that John saw literal things is actually saying he saw symbolic things?
Good question actually. The literal things John saw were recorded in symbolic imagery.

The question you now need to ask yourself now is why and of what.

SecondSon
Sinner

Saved by grace

Joined
18 Dec 16
Moves
557
Clock
30 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@divegeester said
The onus is not on me to state what all the symbolism means, but I know that multiheaded beasts and cavernous hell-holes were billions of non Christians will be burnt alive by Jesus is not literal.
The multiheaded beast is symbolic of something literal, as is the lake of fire.

divegeester
watching in dismay

STARMERGEDDON

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
120597
Clock
30 Jan 20
Vote Up
Vote Down

@secondson said
Good question actually. The literal things John saw were recorded in symbolic imagery.
John saw literal things but they were symbolic?

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.